Thank you! But this graph seems to be showing XLR connection, would this hold true using RCA's at 2.6v? (The 5v equivelant to the XLR higher setting)5V has slightly superior performance as can be seen here..
Thank you! But this graph seems to be showing XLR connection, would this hold true using RCA's at 2.6v? (The 5v equivelant to the XLR higher setting)5V has slightly superior performance as can be seen here..
Sure!Thank you! But this graph seems to be showing XLR connection, would this hold true using RCA's at 2.6v? (The 5v equivelant to the XLR higher setting)
I can't tell the difference, and many others say the same thing. Apparently #7 measures the best.I'm getting this DAC in a few days and I was curious as to what filter would be the best to use, or is it just a preference thing?
Look at this way...whenever there is load-shedding [I think "ohh shiT"] and I switch off the wall outlet, for the wi-fi router, and I get up and switch off the wall outlet for the speakers [which contain amplifiers and DAC]...and when I come back from the kitchen, I get the router's battery/power bank..............because when the power comes on again, 2 hours later, there is usually a spike, the voltage might spike to 250V...it takes a few minutes to stabilise. And when I go out, I switch it all off, in case there is a power disruption while I'm out.In my previous query on D90 ASR thread, when power supply resume from power disruption, my D90 (previous model) is turned on with display screen and not on standby mode (even i turn off the auto power mode), is D90 similar power circuitry like D90SE ?
It becomes my habit to turn off the rear switch whenever I finish listening to music.
Thank you for your answers! - The thing is that the 5v sounds better through my amp. The 4v seems too quiet. But I was wondering if the 4v measures better or worse than the 5v using RCA's in DAC only mode. (No preamp)
Thanks, but I don't have XLR inputs on my amp. Just RCA. So I was trying to figure out if 4v or 5v setting produced same quality measurements through RCA outputs.I'd also try the XLR outputs since they have a higher voltage output than RCAs. I personally prefer XLRs for their common mode-noise immunity.
#7 is a lil' tight at 44.1, #6 would seem the better choice if you insist on a "correct" filter. I would rather avoid the slow rolloff #2 and #4 filters. My faves would probably be the "classic" fast rolloff filters #5 or #3, they may let a bit of aliasing through up to ~24 kHz but are pretty much bombproof beyond that (and the aliased 20-22 kHz range usually contains little in terms of signal anyway).I can't tell the difference, and many others say the same thing. Apparently #7 measures the best.
The Model 30 supposedly has a 2-stage volume (well, most anything with a PGA has these days), is rated 107 dB(A) at 2 Vrms in / rated power out, and does not feature a power amp direct in so you cannot bypass its preamp stage.Ok this might seem like a dumb question but then again you never know in this hobby: Which preamp do you think would provide better performance, using the D90SE's built in preamp, or using the built in preamp in my Marantz Model 30 integrated which has it's own power supply and is rated pretty good. ($3,500 unit in Canada).
Usually unbalanced out is half of balanced out (might lose a few dB of dynamic range but not usually too much). I doubt the NAD would accept input levels that high anyway.Thanks, but I don't have XLR inputs on my amp. Just RCA. So I was trying to figure out if 4v or 5v setting produced same quality measurements through RCA outputs.
The E1DA 9038S dongle comes very very close, and it has a very good headphone amp! - It's $100 USD!The D90SE is clearly an equipment white paper on DAC design fundamentals that should be taken apart and studied by all ChiFi newcomers who can then reduce these principles to its most basic components to offer us the $100 dongle version of this
It does the unfold internally, and due to that, doesn't mentioned to unfold to 88.2, but the proper sample rate.I'm using this DAC (D90SE) with Roon and Tidal and I am having a hard time finding the proper MQA settings.
In Roon, if I set "MQA capabilities" to "Decoder and renderer" and set "Enable MQA core decoder" to "No", it is my understanding that the DAC is then supposed to handle all 3 MQA unfolds (so Roon is just passing everything through as is to the DAC) but according to the DAC's display 44.1/16 MQA isn't being unfolded to 88.2 (the MQA indicator is on but the sample rate shows 44.1).
Thank you for this! ... So how would you help someone to decide which filter is best? I don't really have a grasp on what the different filters mean. Besides I can't really hear any differences anyway... But I want to choose the best one just for piece of mind. Thanks for any input.View attachment 144140
Putting this for anyone that is curious about the dac filters. I noticed not all 9038 implementations have them in the same order.
3Thank you for this! ... So how would you help someone to decide which filter is best? I don't really have a grasp on what the different filters mean. Besides I can't really hear any differences anyway... But I want to choose the best one just for piece of mind. Thanks for any input.
Thank you for this! ... So how would you help someone to decide which filter is best? I don't really have a grasp on what the different filters mean. Besides I can't really hear any differences anyway... But I want to choose the best one just for piece of mind. Thanks for any input.
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-mola-tambaqui-measurements.10693/post-306420I wish that one day MEGADacs claimed to be super good have measurements shown to us. We will all know gow good they really are.
Maybe. The thing is the noise performance is not easily interpreted here. Mola mola has superior noise performance than Dave. D90se from our own measurements indicates its distortion is between Mola Mola and Dave and noise performance is on par or slightly better than Mola Mola.https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-mola-tambaqui-measurements.10693/post-306420
@JohnYang1997 any chance you could generate such graphs for the D90SE for comparison? Thanks in advance.
I also assume it is full scale 0 dB on all DACs, independent of output voltage. So D90SE running at its best 5V would be interesting to see if you would like to try we would appreciate it.Maybe. The thing is the noise performance is not easily interpreted here. Mola mola has superior noise performance than Dave. D90se from our own measurements indicates its distortion is between Mola Mola and Dave and noise performance is on par or slightly better than Mola Mola.
I wouldn't be able to produce a graph that's comparable except at full scale/0dB point as I don't know the test conditions.
I also assume it is full scale 0 dB on all DACs, independent of output voltage. So D90SE running at its best 5V would be interesting to see if you would like to try we would appreciate it.