In full disclosure, your posts
did lead me to realize that I'd managed to
completely misinterpret the thrust of the thread!
I was first and foremost thinking of tracks that explicitly
wouldn't benefit from extremely high quality reproduction... which there "definitely" (IMO, at any rate) are!
In terms of the
actual question -- there are many tracks that do benefit from better reproduction capability. The low-bass content (is it real or "juiced"? I don't know) of many modern (1990s to present) recordings is only apparent with some fairly prodigious LF extension and output.
A good example, for me, is Patty Larkin's
Beg To Differ -- which has this low (synthesized, I presume?)
whoompf in it after the first verse punctuating some of the lines that's pretty amazing... but completely lacking with many smaller loudspeakers.
I have no idea if it'll reproduce from a YT soundtrack (I am guessing
no), but here's the song FWIW.
I quite like Patty Larkin, and this song, as an aside.