Roland68
Master Contributor
Here you will find some information about the circuit:That I know. I can read spec sheets. I want to know why there are two of them and what is the purpose of each one.
Found out the circuit of THX 789. It's nothing new
Here you will find some information about the circuit:That I know. I can read spec sheets. I want to know why there are two of them and what is the purpose of each one.
Hi,Here you will find some information about the circuit:
Found out the circuit of THX 789. It's nothing new
Hi Roland,Here you will find some information about the circuit:
Found out the circuit of THX 789. It's nothing new
Unfortunately I can't tell you that. Since there isn't much information about the circuit and nobody knows exactly how it works, I didn't look into it any further.Hi Roland,
I have a question.
In the SP400, after the R2R volume there is (I suppose) SE to Bal circuit using OPA1612, one per channel.
At that point the signal splits via 470ohm for the back XLR output but also to the 4 THX amplifiers.
I have noticed that there is a transistor connected to each output of the balancing circuit (4 BJT), where the signal splits to XLR and THX.
Do you know for what reason these transistors are there?
I was thinking about mute or biasing the opamp but I think not that and not that.
Thanks,
Guy
Thanks.Unfortunately I can't tell you that. Since there isn't much information about the circuit and nobody knows exactly how it works, I didn't look into it any further.
Maybe you can find something in the THX patent? There are a few layout examples.
Do you also want to use the SP400 as an HPA, or just as a preamplifier?
Then why are you even taking the SP400?Thanks.
I am using the SP400 as a preamp, pushing my SE input amplifier. I am using only pin 2 and GND, leave pin 3 on air not short to ground, although the 470ohm they put allow to short pint 3 to ground.
The 470 resistors and the BJTs at the output of the OPA1612 are between the preamp part and the THX. That the reasons I think I will not find solutions in the THX patent (or circuits).
I am dissipating a lot of heat for just using is as a preamp3 OPA1612 I am using.
You would have to provide an exact temperature for your SP400, because everyone experiences “hot” differently. How long can you leave your hand on the device?Hi,
I wonder, SP400 users.
As you know this amplifier run hot.
For my taste too much.
While open it I notice it is mainly it's SMPS that is really hot.
Any of you have problems with it?
I didn't have yet but I feel the temperature might damage the whole product. Normally SMPS has a very good efficiency. How much that whole consumption could be, it is possible to estimate but it is not so much to make an efficient SMPS so hot.
Thanks,
Guy
I did put some audio feet under mine so there is more airflow. Mine does get „warm“ after multiple hours but I would hardly call it hotEach OPA564 about 40mA, all other opamps about 100mA all together, relays... Less than 500mA.
I operated it with no cover, open box, the SMPS, surprisingly is the hottest.I did put some audio feet under mine so there is more airflow. Mine does get „warm“ after multiple hours but I would hardly call it hot![]()
So, if you can leave your hand on it permanently, for more than 10 seconds, then we're at about 40°, rather less. This is absolutely normal and nothing to worry about at all.Yes, I don't have a thermometer, and of course I could keep my hands on it no problem. So, believe less than 50 degrees Celsius.
It is strange to me such an opamps based device with SMPS hot.
What is more strange is that the SMPS is the hottest part.
If worry so much about the heat on the SP400 just put a 140mm usb fan (a silent one for pc cases) in front of it. Or next to it. You can power it with a usb charger or a powerbank.OK, just was curious.
The DO300EX runs cool but it is a different circuit.
I am not afraid of operating points drift
I was expecting to have it warm little more than DO300EX but it is much more, but still OK as you said.
I am not always count on engineering. For example the KSA250 had a lot of problems because of its temperature
You mean the Krell KSA250?OK, just was curious.
The DO300EX runs cool but it is a different circuit.
I am not afraid of operating points drift
I was expecting to have it warm little more than DO300EX but it is much more, but still OK as you said.
I am not always count on engineering. For example the KSA250 had a lot of problems because of its temperature
OK, so replacement of all these parts every 5-6 years is a good engineering?You mean the Krell KSA250?
Sorry, but it never had a temperature problem, just a user problem.
This is a Class A power amplifier with 700 watts!!! minimum consumption, i.e. 700 watts of heat output. It has to be serviced every 6-8 years, during which not only relays, capacitors, etc. but also other parts have to be replaced and the output stage has to be readjusted. Anyone who buys something like this should know what they are getting into and adhere to the service intervals.