Maybe it's because the MA12070 chip on the AS300 is working with analog signals, whereas the amplification on the AD18 goes through two chips and is being handled digitally only. On the webseite from smsl it says:
"Ad18 uses digital amplify circuit. All analog signal convert to digital signal to make PHASE of input and output signal keep the same. Phase shift is zero. Strong anti-interference ability. High efficiancy up to 90%."
No Phase-shift in my interpretation means "no loss of volume". That may be the cause of tracks playing more loudly on the AD18. However, I do not see a benefit here, since the AD18 is still capped somewhat to a certain point at which the sound will distort. And that point will come earlier compared to the AS300 since the two TAS chips on the AD18 are inferior to the single MA12070 in terms of playing high fidelity. You loose the ability to control the volume less coarsly tho with the Ad18 playing that loudly.
In addition that means the AD18 is not capable of aquiring analog input from a higher tier DAC, it can only receive digital input which is -other than USB- by definition capped to 24bit/192khz. That alone would be enough reason for me to discard it, since the internal USB-DAC is not really good and you can't upgrade it, whereas the AS300 can be upgraded with top tier DACs for years to come, literally as long as it lasts.
"Ad18 uses digital amplify circuit. All analog signal convert to digital signal to make PHASE of input and output signal keep the same. Phase shift is zero. Strong anti-interference ability. High efficiancy up to 90%."
No Phase-shift in my interpretation means "no loss of volume". That may be the cause of tracks playing more loudly on the AD18. However, I do not see a benefit here, since the AD18 is still capped somewhat to a certain point at which the sound will distort. And that point will come earlier compared to the AS300 since the two TAS chips on the AD18 are inferior to the single MA12070 in terms of playing high fidelity. You loose the ability to control the volume less coarsly tho with the Ad18 playing that loudly.
In addition that means the AD18 is not capable of aquiring analog input from a higher tier DAC, it can only receive digital input which is -other than USB- by definition capped to 24bit/192khz. That alone would be enough reason for me to discard it, since the internal USB-DAC is not really good and you can't upgrade it, whereas the AS300 can be upgraded with top tier DACs for years to come, literally as long as it lasts.
Last edited: