It can be worse . Quad had some models where the speaker wires had to cross behind the amp....I will never understand why amps with so much real estate on the back have to put the speaker outputs so close together.
It can be worse . Quad had some models where the speaker wires had to cross behind the amp....I will never understand why amps with so much real estate on the back have to put the speaker outputs so close together.
There is a standard for dual banana jack spacing. I wouldn't personally use banana jacks for anything more crucial than quickly hooking up test supplies, but lots of people do.I will never understand why amps with so much real estate on the back have to put the speaker outputs so close together.
So was the recommendation I was challenged on:That's used price though.
I am going to recommend (used) Rotel RB-1070.
Yes... interesting is a good word.It becomes really interesting in bridge mode .
Bought my 1st integrated (NAD 3140) at HiFi Buys in 1979. Nostalgia...This is my unit I sent in. I bought it new in 2006 at Hi Fi Buys in Nashville, Tennessee. Retail price was $700 but I got it for $650 as part of a matching set with the RC-1070 pre amp, and the RCD 1072 cd player and a pair of Revel Performa M-22 speakers. I still have all the pieces and they all are in good shape and sound very good to me.
I bought a matching amp years ago so I could run both in bridged mode. Was so excited to get it set up. Within 15 minutes I realized the sound was really bad, like PA amplifier bad and promptly unbridged them. Afterward just used one channel on each amp as a left and right for years and was quite happy though the cabling was a bit over the top.
Then I discovered the Genelec 8000 series after Amir's review (with their built in Class D amps) and I'm now in Audio Nirvana. The Genelecs are plugged into the RC-1070 pre amp with rca adapters along with a Schitt Modi 3 from the PC and CD players. The pre amp has a remote too so super convenient. Radio Swiss Classic is my main source atm. But Led Zep remasters run a close second.
If you're on the fence about the Genelecs, I urge you to jump in with both feet.
Thanks for the solid review Amir!
Cheers!
A personal recommendation is just that. If what you want is SINAD rankings they are already present in a chart in the very same review and you can simply ignore the recommendation.I read enough reviews to tell that in many AVC/AVR cases, SINAD is THE ranking factor… Look at reviewers ranking… It doesn’t make sense to recommend this amp without putting it into context more than; it’s not expensive and already 20 years old. I don’t mind the measurements because these are great. Just the rather ‘personal’ final statement at the end of every review about ‘recommending’ or not.
Bought my 1st integrated (NAD 3140) at HiFi Buys in 1979. Nostalgia...
Yes-I now have a spare as well. Can't have too many.That amp is, in my opinion, the real overlooked NAD classic. Better in every respect to the venerable 3020, and you can buy them for very little money.
![]()
I've seen many NAD amps and receivers of this time frame that appear to be a organized nest. That's how they built them at the time.Nice sparrow nest wiring.
Nice review! According to an older post on the following forum, the Rotel RB 1070 listed for $699 when new.This is a review and detailed measurements of the Rotel RB-1070 stereo power amplifier. It was released in early 2000. Can't find the cost then but I see it used for around $400 to $500.
View attachment 258672
I have always found Rotels to be most attractively designed power amplifiers. One look at that front panel and you immediately think of muscle and beauty in design. Alas, the extruded aluminum in front which gives it that look, is cosmetic. There are two others internally which do the job of cooling this classic AB design. In use the heastsinks got pretty warm to touch to give it some air to breath.
Not much news in the back other than nice inclusion of trigger input/output:
View attachment 258673
Rotel RB-1070 Measurements
The unit warmed up nicely without its performance changing much:
View attachment 258674
So let's see what our dashboard of 1 kHz tone does into 4 ohm load:
View attachment 258675
The amp is about 2 dB more sensitive than usual which likely accentuates the power supply noise a bit. I was able to reduce 60 Hz hum in one channel but not simultaneously in the other. That is exceeded however by the power supply noise at 120 Hz and multiples. SINAD is likely dominated by distortion to the tune of -80 dB. This lands the RB-1070 slightly above average of all amplifiers tested:
View attachment 258676
Despite the power supply noise, dynamic range is very good:
View attachment 258677
Frequency response is excellent and spec compliant:
View attachment 258678
Crosstalk is good:
View attachment 258679
Multitone shows no frequency dependence which is nice:
View attachment 258680
There is ample power available into 4 ohm:
View attachment 258681
The response is quite odd in that it doesn't slope down. Don't know if that is intentional, accidental or due to power supply caps aging, letting in more ripple as power goes up.
Regardless, lots of power is available:
View attachment 258683
Company only specs the power into 8 ohm at 130 watts. It certainly delivers that:
View attachment 258684
Putting aside noise floor which is rather high, the units transfer function is one of the best I have ever seen:
View attachment 258685
Sadly there is a significant power on pop:
View attachment 258686
Conclusions
As one of my favorite (looking) brands, I was very anxious to measure a Rotel amp, hoping it would not let me down. Fortunately it did not. No, the SINAD doesn't break new ground but the rest of the measurements are very good with plenty of power available. It is a great choice for people wanting good amount of power in an attractive package with competent performance.
I am going to recommend (used) Rotel RB-1070.
----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
Funny that you posted the Monster HTS3600mkII...I just got one from a friend and love it! Everytime I walk by it and I see what the AC voltage of my house (at least that outlet) the nerd in me smiles. I do switch it to the amps mode when cranking my stereo. I could care less about any of the filtering claims it makes. The main reason I got it was that it has some switched outlets (triggered by a switched outlet in my preamp/tuner coming on in my case), so I plug my power amp into the switched outlet and keep its power switch on, so everything comes on when I turn the preamp/tuner on...For early 2000's, and for that price. Honestly not that bad. And I agree, the look is nice. Reminds me of those older Monster Power Conditioners.
![]()
The real comparison at this point in time would be a resto-modded NAD 2200.Nice retro review, but even used price, I would not recommend it nowadays. Just not competitive anymore. Sure maybe 20 years ago it was, but not now IMO.
Schiit VidarWhich similar performance can be had to this but new?
This is my unit I sent in. I bought it new in 2006 at Hi Fi Buys in Nashville, Tennessee. Retail price was $700 but I got it for $650 as part of a matching set with the RC-1070 pre amp, and the RCD 1072 cd player and a pair of Revel Performa M-22 speakers. I still have all the pieces and they all are in good shape and sound very good to me.
I bought a matching amp years ago so I could run both in bridged mode. Was so excited to get it set up. Within 15 minutes I realized the sound was really bad, like PA amplifier bad and promptly unbridged them. Afterward just used one channel on each amp as a left and right for years and was quite happy though the cabling was a bit over the top.
Then I discovered the Genelec 8000 series after Amir's review (with their built in Class D amps) and I'm now in Audio Nirvana. The Genelecs are plugged into the RC-1070 pre amp with rca adapters along with a Schitt Modi 3 from the PC and CD players. The pre amp has a remote too so super convenient. Radio Swiss Classic is my main source atm. But Led Zep remasters run a close second.
If you're on the fence about the Genelecs, I urge you to jump in with both feet.
Thanks for the solid review Amir!
Cheers!
I have a Bryston 4BST that I've owned for 15 years. Got the caps replaced last year. I still love it -- likely to be the last power amp I'll own until I'm forced to downsize. It will have no problems lasting another 20 years, IMHO. The Rotels of the era can be similarly long-lasting.Hmm .. would you kindly be specific? How about this, for example
SoundStageNetwork.com | SoundStage.com - BHK Labs Measurements: Bryston 4B3 Stereo/Mono Amplifier
www.soundstagenetwork.com
![]()
Bryston 7B SST2 monoblock power amplifier Measurements
Sidebar 3: Measurements I examined the Bryston 7B SST2's measured behavior using mainly Stereophile's loaner sample of the top-of-the-line Audio Precision SYS2722 system (see the January 2008 "As We See It" and www.ap.com); for some tests, I also used my vintage Audio Precision System One Dual...www.stereophile.com
I see it as fairly consistent with what was said about the much newer Schiit Vidar I referenced earlier.I can’t help from seeing some biased recommending here.