I am a scientist by profession (though not in anything related to audio) so I like to stick to the scientific method. Opinions are about what music you like, like Bach or the Stones. That is fine, as there is no valid methodology to decide. For me, however, facts are not a mattter of opinion, nor, to be precise, can there be alternative facts.
This is not, of course, to say that the CCA is necessarily perfect, particularly on its analogue output. The question is if there is a reasonable possibility, given existing research, that the differences that there are would be audible. The standard of proof is pretty high.