Of course. But I'm not missing the point.
The point of listening to the music is enjoying in listening to the music.
The point of listening to a HQ sound (music) is enjoying further more in a music being played with a HQ sound.
How I got to this personal enjoyment, if I got there, is completely irrelevant. I'm enjoying it.
What the objective measurements show is also not relevant to my enjoyment.
Should I enjoy more if I see the graphs and measurements are nice? Or should I enjoy less if I see the graphs and measurements are not as nice?
Now if this happens,
that's a bias as well
seeng those graphs should not affect how I hear it and how I enjoy it, but it can happen...right?
Everyone has to set his reference point in search for that perfect sound. If one wishes to go with graphs and measurements feel free, but to me, it's my ears. Everyone should be free to choose the reference, well...this one is mine, personal. I can't advocate it since it's subjective. What I how I hear and what and hwo you hear is not necessarily the same...right? So there's no comparison. No result.
Only personal enjoyment. And no matter how we approach it, in the end you and me and everyone else will listen through our ears.
Why so? Because what I see and what I hear don't align perfectly. And I'm pretty much
sceptic whether objective guys measure it all and if they perfectly described the human hearing mechanism with those set of measurements which is usually being done. Otherwise, I think this is not the all there is guys.
It would be great if seing measurements would suffice to hypnotize me to a perfect enjoyment through listening experience, but it just doesn't happen.