I got to hear the new Lyngdorf CUE-100 today, they were really great. At the Bristol show with full Lyngdorf streamer/amps. Kept me in my seat and wanting to hear more.
There was a perfection that I didn't hear in many other systems and a clarity (lack of distortion?) that was epic.
Amazing what the little 6.5" with a few passive radiators can put out, the RoomPerfect software helped tighten up the bass (they did an A/B).
£19k+ a pair. Hopefully I can build something with the woofers soon.
I heard the same system at the same show. Sound was truly excellent.
I was surprised how much better this was than almost anything at the show.
The demo of the room EQ was very good.
What surprised me was the only thing that sounded as good (in fact it was marginally better IMO) was the much cheaper Warfdale floorstanders.
Sadly, most tweeters have a strongly narrowing dispersion in the top octave which simply seems to have become an accepted fact of life. It has even become the norm to seek a predicted in room response that tilts downwards which is the consequence of the poor dispersion of today’s tweeters."
These are all very good reasons. Yet the flat response would still deviate from a tilted down slope that the mixing and mastering engineers used to finish the song.@Matias There are plenty of usecases for linear off axis performance! I like my reference speakers in a good controlled room are flat at high frequencies to hear all the details and make mixing easier. And this is not bright, it sounds natural. Also many rooms have too much dampening at high frequencies -> linear radiation helps.
It's just for untreated rooms with hard reflective surfaces (modern concrete & glass bunkers) where it is quickly too much. Or when you like your sound very bass heavy and warm.
Have you ever heared speakers with tweeters like Bliesma T34A or T25A? It's amazing how far you can move off axis and the sound stays perfectly the same. I build my kitchen speakers with T25A for that reason and also my surrounds to get as much hf energy off axis as possible for all seats.
No - it isn't. The tilted Harman Curve is just ONE of the possible room curves. But very rarely you aim for a complete flat curve, that's also true.Yet the flat response would still deviate from a tilted down slope that the mixing and mastering engineers used to finish the song.
New article about the new tweeter.
The PURIFI Tweeter Project - Part 1
A Short Story of a Long Multi-Disciplinary R&D Effortpurifi-audio.com
"Sadly, most tweeters have a strongly narrowing dispersion in the top octave which simply seems to have become an accepted fact of life. It has even become the norm to seek a predicted in room response that tilts downwards which is the consequence of the poor dispersion of today’s tweeters."
They still did not get the part of deviating from the norm and therefore creating a circle of confusion... aka bright.
View attachment 371052
AFAIK the only commercial available Bliesma T25A execution is the Sun Audio Purified 4, throwing a wide dispersion indeed. Considering the concept, I would expect they will also offer the Purifi tweeter when available.@Matias There are plenty of usecases for linear off axis performance! I like my reference speakers in a good controlled room are flat at high frequencies to hear all the details and make mixing easier. And this is not bright, it sounds natural. Also many rooms have too much dampening at high frequencies -> linear radiation helps.
It's just for untreated rooms with hard reflective surfaces (modern concrete & glass bunkers) where it is quickly too much. Or when you like your sound very bass heavy and warm.
Have you ever heared speakers with tweeters like Bliesma T34A or T25A? It's amazing how far you can move off axis and the sound stays perfectly the same. I build my kitchen speakers with T25A for that reason and also my surrounds to get as much hf energy off axis as possible for all seats.
- Complete freedom to adjust the dispersion with a waveguide.
So far real world high SPL champions with nice performance,low fs,really low distortion,etc are the Elipticors,specially D3404/55200.I personally think the wide dispersing tweeter is really interesting (never heard anyone say anything bad about Bliesma so far) but what I'm more interested in is the distortion numbers. The purifi mids and woofers do better than anything I've seen in terms of distortion, will the tweeter similarly become the unit to beat?
And if the dispersion is too wide for your taste, as they note, you have
I bought a new spaeker that doesn't beam in the top and sounds really good these highs-end hz"Sadly, most tweeters have a strongly narrowing dispersion in the top octave which simply seems to have become an accepted fact of life. It has even become the norm to seek a predicted in room response that tilts downwards which is the consequence of the poor dispersion of today’s tweeters."
I'm interested to see where the breakup mode of this driver is. IIRC the Aluminum domes from Bliesma have theirs way up around 27khz or something, (at least I am sure they are ultrasonic) so much less problematic than others. Presumably Purifi has made some efforts in that regard. IMO that would remove some reason to seek out beryllium over aluminum.The biggest driver I see for this (being a fan of beryllium tweeters) is that the whole beryllium supply problem from Materion is driving prices through the roof. I'd be happy to fall in love with a new tweeter that isn't beryllium. So far the Satori textreme tweeter is "great" but still not "equal" to the best beryllium domes, at least from what I've read and the small number of speakers I've heard it in.
Are you including horns? I have seen *some* horns that have a really constant directivity. But if you mean domes, I can't think of one.There are constant directivity tweeters all around for decades/centuries, not?