I was still editing my post to get my tots straight when i saw your reply
Since all this curve is thing is a matter of preference, then I feel that Harman curve should not be made a standard. It should not be heavily used to judge how good a headphone is because it is altering the music. I am not saying the Harman curve is bad , i mean there should be a better standard.
- What i am trying to say is my ideal music listening experience would be,
Since all this curve is thing is a matter of preference, then I feel that Harman curve should not be made a standard. It should not be heavily used to judge how good a headphone is because it is altering the music. I am not saying the Harman curve is bad , i mean there should be a better standard.
- What i am trying to say is my ideal music listening experience would be,
- I want to be able to listen to the music the way it was recorded by the recording engineer or who ever it is. I want to hear the work of the recording engineer as is or as close as possible. If the recording engineer has put in this amount of bass, mid, treble , etc, i dont want my headphone to alter it as much as possible. I would then say how good or bad my headphone is depending of how much sound deviates from the original recording.
- I want to hear what the recording engineer heard. Then it is for me to say if i prefer his recording or not, just me and the music and nothing in between. If i want to EQ the sound to my tastes, then its up to me.
Last edited: