And...I have not in my Bimby...guess you have 'golden ears' and I don't.
In all seriousness though, apparently you are an unlucky Schiit customer and I'm am a lucky one...as multiple Schiit products have failed in your case and none have in mine. BTW...none of my iFi, Sony, Fiio, Emotiva, etc. products have failed either...such is generally the nature of decent audio products these days.
Again, DBT takes care of all of this. Comparing measurements does not, it simply says one thing measures better than another. Measurements may/may not point to other issues such as QC, etc. but these are also measurable by failure rates, etc.
The following has nothing to do with Schiit gear...merely a philosophical question to provoke thought/discussion.
Let's say, for argument sake, that a well-designed and executed DBT for 2 pieces of hardware with identical costs, failure rates, etc. is conducted and the statistical results show that a certain piece of gear is consistently favored by listeners. In addition, you participated in the DBT...and you learn post-test that
you consistently favored this piece of gear as well.
However, the preferred piece of gear doesn't 'measure' as well as the other.
Are you saying, that all other parameters being equal, you'd choose the gear that measured better over the one that you and the sample determined to sound better?