D
Deleted member 58670
Guest
It should have been 0.5 dB per step in my opinion. But then more than 64 steps would be required.64 steps in 1 dB increments.
I’m also missing a display showing the attenuation in dB.
It should have been 0.5 dB per step in my opinion. But then more than 64 steps would be required.64 steps in 1 dB increments.
I've built a lot of switched attenuators. After a lot of experimentation, loaning them to other people etc, I determined there is in fact no need for less than 1 db steps for music. You'll never switch a step and think, "I wish I could reduce/increase the volume a bit less than that." It is effectively subjectively continuous.It should have been 0.5 dB per step in my opinion. But then more than 64 steps would be required.
I’m also missing a display showing the attenuation in dB.
My Anthem AVM70 has got 0.5 dB steps, and they claim it’s all analog…. Most AVRs have 0.5 dB steps. Must be a reason for it?I've built a lot of switched attenuators. After a lot of experimentation, loaning them to other people etc, I determined there is in fact no need for less than 1 db steps for music. You'll never switch a step and think, "I wish I could reduce/increase the volume a bit less than that." It is effectively subjectively continuous.
One ups-manship? My AV preamp has .5 db steps. Wish it were 1 db so it would step faster from the remote. Maybe auto-level setting all the channels they use the same volume chip so they need smaller steps for that. For basic volume it is more steps than needed.My Anthem AVM70 has got 0.5 dB steps, and they claim it’s all analog…. Most AVRs have 0.5 dB steps. Must be a reason for it?
But according to Amir above, this is a different company from that one.Love Lundahl products. Their rectifier chokes, power transformers and output transformers are of very high quality. I use their products on my tube amp and they deliver great subjective sound
![]()
If the price of a product is not determined (or currently "secret"), deny to review it.
Because what to vote depends on its price.Why? It's a technical review. Price may determine ultimate value, but has nothing to do with measured test results.
Wait until you find out a price before voting.
Oh no we are guessing price. Okay, good idea. I'm guessing you are guessing low. I think about $4k US.This is not going to be cheap.
With 6 balanced channels, there will be 12 sets of 6 groups of switched precision resistors, possibly 36 relays and the remote receiver, likely an analogue pot, read by an A/D line on the micro and a whole bunch of relay drivers.
And made in Sweden? Small production, not a big seller. I'm gonna say well over US$1,000. Probably $1499-2k.
Oh, well I am guessing that you are guessing that he is guessing..I'm guessing you are guessing low.
As this is part of a three-piece system normally (VC - DSP x-over - PSU) I would guess 2k euro a piece or 5k for all.Oh, well I am guessing that you are guessing that he is guessing..
~1K+ seems likely. Curious how much it'll cost.
It shouldn’t, and that’s not the point of the poll. Vote on its technical performance, features, and interface, decide whether to buy based on price.Because what to vote depends on its price.
That's not my experience using my Devialet which has 0.5 steps, I might just be fussier than you about this. I also like that it feels like an analogue control (it's DSP) with smooth changes, where 1db changes are stepped enough to break the illusion.I've built a lot of switched attenuators. After a lot of experimentation, loaning them to other people etc, I determined there is in fact no need for less than 1 db steps for music. You'll never switch a step and think, "I wish I could reduce/increase the volume a bit less than that." It is effectively subjectively continuous.