• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Linkwitz LX521.4 - new build and impressions

JP

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Messages
2,295
Likes
2,474
Location
Brookfield, CT
Definitely laced with it, though some points are... interesting, but yes, nothing to really respond to. I can't read up on some of the stuff mentioned on OPLUG - even though I'm an owner of LX Mini +2 and 521.4s, my access was revoked seemingly in retaliation for my factual account of a sub-par experience with Frank that I posted here.

Despite the manufacturing issues with my mini's which aren't a Siegfried issue, I enjoyed them until they fell apart (rebuildable, but a pain). My Madisound kit built 521.4 are still going strong, and are still my main speakers.
 

JP

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Messages
2,295
Likes
2,474
Location
Brookfield, CT
@JP Sorry to hear of your plight

You had a very different opinion of the matter March '22, and I've nothing to do with anyone getting banned - not sure what the intent is here?
 

ManFromKerala

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2022
Messages
19
Likes
20
LX521 owners,

I am considering using a Genelec G3 with a Dipole sub of LX521. Listening about 3 meters away, in a room about 7X15X3.5 (meters)/22X15X12 (feet).
Keeping costs aside, what would be your comments on this approach.
 
OP
S

suttondesign

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
735
Likes
1,313
Location
Bellingham, WA
If you accept that you won't get much response below 30-35hz in a room that size, then it's just the usual question of integrating 2 subs. See elsewhere in this forum for that.

However, it's quite important not to overpower those bass modules. Check either the Siegfried site or the oplug forum for info on the amp needs; but I know the wrong thing is overdriving open-baffle drivers, which is easy to do. Instead of pressurizing a box, you're trying to pressurize a room, and below about 35 hz you'd wreck the voice coils on those woofer drivers by pumping watts into them in the futile attempt to have a disco party.

Running those bass units from 30hz to 80hz will provide a very natural sound, which is great, much better than boxes, IMHO. But if you're doing soundtracks or movies, you need to high-pass these bass units. Trust me on that. I can readily bottom out these woofers with Hans Zimmer soundtracks. I high-pass them and added 2 DIY, dual-opposed subs below 50hz to kick the shit out of deep bass.
 

ManFromKerala

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2022
Messages
19
Likes
20
Thanks. This is for music, not movies.
I already have the LX521 subs.

I was more concerned about the clarity, tonality, soundstage etc. Basically, its much easier to get a genelec G3/8030C where I live, compared to building the LX521 top baffle part, cost wise. So unless the LX521 is vastly superior to G3, I could settle for a Genelec or a Kali.

Obviously only folks who have heard both might be able to offer advise. Hence thought of asking here..
 
OP
S

suttondesign

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
735
Likes
1,313
Location
Bellingham, WA
Thanks. This is for music, not movies.
I already have the LX521 subs.

I was more concerned about the clarity, tonality, soundstage etc. Basically, its much easier to get a genelec G3/8030C where I live, compared to building the LX521 top baffle part, cost wise. So unless the LX521 is vastly superior to G3, I could settle for a Genelec or a Kali.
y
Obviously only folks who have heard both might be able to offer advise. Hence thought of asking here..
I can speak to the Dutch 8C, which are in that small, accomplished family of box speakers. They have superlative smoothness, more than the top baffle of the LX521. I think the combo you describe would be excellent. I think the LX521 has peerless soundstaging, esp. with classical recordings, but by no means was I ever unhappy with the Dutch. I mean, it gets to the point where you're splitting hairs. I say go for it.
 

mamsterla

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2020
Messages
16
Likes
14
If you accept that you won't get much response below 30-35hz in a room that size, then it's just the usual question of integrating 2 subs. See elsewhere in this forum for that.

However, it's quite important not to overpower those bass modules. Check either the Siegfried site or the oplug forum for info on the amp needs; but I know the wrong thing is overdriving open-baffle drivers, which is easy to do. Instead of pressurizing a box, you're trying to pressurize a room, and below about 35 hz you'd wreck the voice coils on those woofer drivers by pumping watts into them in the futile attempt to have a disco party.

Running those bass units from 30hz to 80hz will provide a very natural sound, which is great, much better than boxes, IMHO. But if you're doing soundtracks or movies, you need to high-pass these bass units. Trust me on that. I can readily bottom out these woofers with Hans Zimmer soundtracks. I high-pass them and added 2 DIY, dual-opposed subs below 50hz to kick the shit out of deep bass.
I agree with this take - I have the LX521.4 and in my room the dipole bass starts to struggle below 50Hz. I have them crossed over to subs (Rythmik F15HP) there so that I do not burn out the coils. I could push a little lower, but no reason.

As for the sound of Genelec vs LX521.4 baffles - that's going to be your own guess. The radiation pattern is different and the voicing is too. You are just building a sat/sub system with dipole subs. If you like what you get, then it is probably a decent system with the advantages of dipole base.
 

Pultzar

Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2020
Messages
67
Likes
34
Monopole bass with DSP such as Dirac Live Bass Control should be considered instead of dealing with the downsides of dipole bass. I run LX521 and Dirac has been the biggest improvement I have heard with the bass region.

In my experience, dipole bass can measure much better or worse than monopole, depending on the room, speaker location, listener location, etc.
 

ManFromKerala

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2022
Messages
19
Likes
20
Thx. I find that I am able to manage bass better with the dipoles - with suitable placements. I was more concerned about the tonality and the integration between the dipole subs and the alternative-to-521-baffle.

Context is: my lx mini drivers are damaged. The 2 sub4's are OK. I didn't want to try re-buliding the LX mini again. I could either invest in the drivers for LX 521 baffle (since I already have the sub4s) or pick an alternate such as Genelecs or the Kalis. Cost wise: a pair of Kali IN-8 is comparable to the delta cost of building a 521 baffle with drivers.

(I have the amps and such - just need to build a baffle, if I go for 521).

Also, I like the tonality of JBL305mkII much more than the tonality of LX mini.
At the moment, I am leaning towards a pair of Kali IN-8s :). I am a bit reluctant to try seas again, given that I had 4 FU10RBs and 2 L16RNSLs go bad.
Also my room is about 13 wide by 25 long by 10 feet tall - perhaps a bit too small for 521.

My only concern about these Kali/Genelec/* is image stability. LX Studio has spoiled me with the image stability. Which ever way you move, the phantom scene remains intact. Things don't suddenly shift if you move your head 5 inches :)
 

jeffbook

Active Member
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
139
Likes
193
Location
Columbus, Ohio
Thx. I find that I am able to manage bass better with the dipoles - with suitable placements. I was more concerned about the tonality and the integration between the dipole subs and the alternative-to-521-baffle.

Context is: my lx mini drivers are damaged. The 2 sub4's are OK. I didn't want to try re-buliding the LX mini again. I could either invest in the drivers for LX 521 baffle (since I already have the sub4s) or pick an alternate such as Genelecs or the Kalis. Cost wise: a pair of Kali IN-8 is comparable to the delta cost of building a 521 baffle with drivers.

(I have the amps and such - just need to build a baffle, if I go for 521).

Also, I like the tonality of JBL305mkII much more than the tonality of LX mini.
At the moment, I am leaning towards a pair of Kali IN-8s :). I am a bit reluctant to try seas again, given that I had 4 FU10RBs and 2 L16RNSLs go bad.
Also my room is about 13 wide by 25 long by 10 feet tall - perhaps a bit too small for 521.

My only concern about these Kali/Genelec/* is image stability. LX Studio has spoiled me with the image stability. Which ever way you move, the phantom scene remains intact. Things don't suddenly shift if you move your head 5 inches :)
On the Linkwitz Lab web page, Siegfried recommended a minimum room of 240 sq. ft. with a minimum ceiling height of 8 ft. Your room size exceeds both of these handily. I run a set of LX521 baffles with the Orion bass modules in a 237.5 sq ft. room with a 7.67 ft. ceiling height and I have no issues with the smaller room size.

The sound picture the LX521 presents appears to be much cleaner and better focused than the LXminis with the Orion bass modules they replaced. I don't know if what I hear matches up with your "tonality" comments, and expectation bias could be also be playing a part on my part. However, I would not want to give up the imaging and sound quality that one obtains with the Linkwitz LX521 design for a a ported box monitor and the potential integration problems of a ported box with the LX521 bass modules.

Good luck with whatever decision you make and have fun enjoying the music.
 

AudioJester

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
943
Likes
1,256
I have Lx521, IN8, 8040b and kh120.

The Lx521 bass modules sound slow and ponderous with my active monitors. If you were starting with monitors they would be totally the wrong choice. The bass modules work best 50-300Hz.
Your better off building the Lx521, or selling the bass modules and buying sealed subs.
 

LeeM

New Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2024
Messages
1
Likes
0
I didn't go looking to see if anyone has measured these LX-521.4 with a Klippel NFS or done an anechoic or quasi anechoic, but Erin measured the LXmini and boy on boy, they did not do well at all.

I want to be open minded with these speakers, especially according to Linkwitz website, Dr. Toole spoke highly of him and heck even Erin spoke highly of him in his video. Would love to be able to audition them somewhere.
I'm new to this forum and since I have some Lx521.4s in the living room and a 11.4.4 theater in the basement using 7 Lx minis I found this thread interesting particularly Erin's testing of the Minis and Frank's comments on the dip he showed as compared to SL's original testing. I looked around a bit trying to find out what amps, pre-amps, and testing equipment, etc he was using but couldn't find much other than he switched from the Klippel to the Dayton Omni mic setup. I did find where he was doing his testing listed on his website.

"All my testing is done in my garage. It is not an ideal environment but I have taken steps to ensure the data is as accurate as it can be. This means spot treating the room with acoustic panels, and testing when the temperatures are approximately equivalent to ensure accuracy and consistency within my own data set."
 
Top Bottom