Is it worth getting a better subwoofer?

[Harryharryharry]

I'm looking to buy a second subwoofer, in addition to my SVS SB-1000 Pro, Genelec 8331s and Minidsp Flex with Dirac.

The decision I'm toying with is whether I should get another 1000 Pro or an objectively better subwoofer.

I spent a while looking into subwoofers on the various threads, measurements and the subwoofer comparison sheet and identified the Arendal 1961S as a great option for a better second sub.

Two reasons I'm unsure if it's justified.

1. I listen at low levels, 65-75db. I don't find it's lacking bass, but given the advice on two is better than one I'm intrigued as to the benefits of nicer more even bass.

2. I have a 1 year old baby, so there's a real risk of the speaker getting poked and ruined.

Are any audible improvements expected from there a higher performing sub at low listening levels? Or is this wasted money?

The room is an open plan kitchen / living room 7.5m x 4.5m. Thanks!

 

[amper42]

I would skip the 2nd subwoofer and put the money in an S&P index fund for your 1 year old baby instead. It will be a nice nest egg for her/him. 5 years from now you will be happy you did.

 

[Harryharryharry]

Already have expect it's a fossil fuel free global stock index

 

[dfiler]

With an open floor plan and that sub, the room isn't being pressurized so you won't feel bass punch. But at your listening level, that may not matter. Also, you'd have to significantly go up in size and power to pressurize an open floor plan.

If you're already happy with the volume, I'd get a matching sub. It will be cheaper and will integrate perfectly for more even response in every seat. If you decide to upgrade later, it is easy to sell a matching pair of subs. And if you do upgrade, it would likely be beyond a 12" so you'd be selling both subs anyway.