• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Hifiman Ananda Review (headphone)

manishex

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2020
Messages
25
Likes
9
Amp distortion is completely irrelevant here. It is magnitudes lower than that of the headphone.



Nope is an excellent measuring and sounding headphone. Needs a bit of EQ... just like all other headphones can be improved by this.
Bass on the LCD2 can be more impressive.
I don't understand the worrying about distortion. There is something like audibility thresholds. Not everyone will blast so loud it becomes an audible issue.

Was it mentioned yet that the Ananda works fine directly from a phone ?
I was alluding to the fact that if the amp is over or under powering the headphones (gain) would distortion levels measured from the headphones change? Because low/medium/high gain slighty affects my listening levels. When my headphones are underpowered the sound closes up and I can't get to a high volume without being suffocated in sound. Whereas on high gain the dynamics are too strong and the treble a bit too raw so I turn volume down.
 
Joined
Apr 9, 2021
Messages
5
Likes
16
The butthurt is real, lol.

From cultists realizing that Amir brought great things to the industry on the electronic side but on the headphone side he is woefully lacking but will rush to defend him to their deaths? Yup.

Deviation from the norm is not the norm. It's just bad data. Unlike with electronic measurements that we're relatively new when Amir started doing them, headphone measurements are not.

It's also a disservice to the community for Amir not to mention where his gear is sourced from. In this case, he measured a pair of Anandas that were manufactured in 2019. 2 years of pad wear on them. He didn't mention that he got a Phonitor X that was "refurbished" (turned out not by the manufacturer) that was clearly defective. None of that helps anybody. Information is a good thing. Purposely omitting information like this actively harms the science behind measurements.
 

the_brunx

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2020
Messages
342
Likes
859
he has explained transparently over and over why he’s measurements are the most accurate and makes the best sense. In fact, others are secretly learning a lot from him whether they admit it or not.
You are the one here who has your head in the sand and is stubborn, so much that you have to hide behind a new account to come here and insult his work.
 

Cahudson42

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 21, 2019
Messages
1,083
Likes
1,557
Suppose we took the same pair of Ananda's and:
First, ask Resolve/Andrew to repeat the measurements on his Gras
Second, yes it's a different rig entirely, but then ask @solderdude to also measure..

Might this help answer many of the questions previously posed? (Mismounting, 2019 aged pads, defective, etc. etc)

To me, the problems on Group Delay really stand out. How could all that he a seal issue? Yet if these 2019 phones have a zillion hours on them, you could entertain the possibility things could 'loosen up' - resulting in this.

Let's have others test the same phones..Certainly might be interesting..
 
Last edited:

Racheski

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 20, 2020
Messages
1,116
Likes
1,702
Location
Chicago
From cultists realizing that Amir brought great things to the industry on the electronic side but on the headphone side he is woefully lacking but will rush to defend him to their deaths? Yup.

Deviation from the norm is not the norm. It's just bad data. Unlike with electronic measurements that we're relatively new when Amir started doing them, headphone measurements are not.

It's also a disservice to the community for Amir not to mention where his gear is sourced from. In this case, he measured a pair of Anandas that were manufactured in 2019. 2 years of pad wear on them. He didn't mention that he got a Phonitor X that was "refurbished" (turned out not by the manufacturer) that was clearly defective. None of that helps anybody. Information is a good thing. Purposely omitting information like this actively harms the science behind measurements.
Nice, another square to add to ASR Headphone Measurement Bingo.
1617985022221.png
 

ishmeister

Active Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2018
Messages
116
Likes
103
Location
England
Ananda was the headphone I owned previous to getting my current OG HD800. The comfort just wasn't there for me - too much clamp. It's the only headphone I've ever had to put on over the top of my head (like a helmet) because it doesn't stretch out wide enough to clear my glasses frames from the front.
 

Jimbob54

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
11,116
Likes
14,783
Is that an idea for another square? The "ASR is a cult" square?
Seems to be, but not directly related to the measurements I don't think.

Amir inviting us all round for jesus juice and sinad worship is what people think is cultish. Nonsense, I say!
 
Joined
Apr 9, 2021
Messages
5
Likes
16
Nice, another square to add to ASR Headphone Measurement Bingo.
View attachment 122954

If Amir is so confident in his findings, send the same unit to @Resolve or @antdroid (Crin is too far) and see if they're the same.

Amir constantly challenges Jude to say where gear is sourced from in his reviews and yet he shouldn't be held to the same standards?
 

cursive

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Messages
237
Likes
423
From cultists realizing that Amir brought great things to the industry on the electronic side but on the headphone side he is woefully lacking but will rush to defend him to their deaths? Yup.

Deviation from the norm is not the norm. It's just bad data. Unlike with electronic measurements that we're relatively new when Amir started doing them, headphone measurements are not.

It's also a disservice to the community for Amir not to mention where his gear is sourced from. In this case, he measured a pair of Anandas that were manufactured in 2019. 2 years of pad wear on them. He didn't mention that he got a Phonitor X that was "refurbished" (turned out not by the manufacturer) that was clearly defective. None of that helps anybody. Information is a good thing. Purposely omitting information like this actively harms the science behind measurements.

Just wanted to say I'm the one who sent these Ananda in for testing. To me one of the main appeals of ASR is that we can send our individual items in for testing, and is better than sourcing equipment direct from manufacturers meant for review, or equipment that's been on review tours with tons of people handling them, this is a real sample that someone would buy and take home. Again these were purchased from Hifiman directly Dec. 2019, so not two years old. These had all of the QC stamps and stickers on the box and shipped straight from hifiman, so I do think this is a representative pair. I've owned two pair of Ananda over the years and these were no different than my first pair visually, and audio wise. The drivers also look identical.

The stock pads had the glue let go and came apart pretty quickly, so these were a fresh set of pads from hifiman that I sent to Amir, I think the shape, especially at the "front" pretty much always have a dip and indentation due to the construction of the pads. The new Ananda actually don't have the dust cover attached to the pads anymore as that is where the pads would start coming apart where the dust cover attached to the pad seam with glue.

I agree with a lot of what you're saying, and I do wish we could have all the reviewers all measure the exact same set of headphones, but unfortunately that's not realistic for most samples. I do honestly enjoy the ananda, and that's why I bought them twice lol, sold my first pair, regretted it, and bought another. As solderdude pointed out, I pretty much would never listen above 90db, so the distortion issue isn't as big of a deal as most are making it out to be. Of course as a human I wish it were better to justify my past purchases hah, but if I'm honest with myself, I like the sound.

Also pedantic note here: Amir did clearly state the Phonitor X was purchased refurbished by a member and sent to him.

EDIT: I don't have any problem sending this same pair to other reviewers. I kind of want them back as I miss them and have to do some traveling for work, but I would be happy to send to another as long as the shipping is reasonable.
 
Last edited:

Acerun

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Messages
1,105
Likes
491
Location
San Francisco
Wow! Amazed by the high distortion! And these are a double-sided magnet design, which -'in theory' are supposed to provide lower distortion.

Now - please
Sundara
HE5xx/Deva
HE 400se 'stealth'
HE560 adorama

+1 on HE560 V4
 

Resolve

Active Member
Reviewer
Joined
Jan 20, 2021
Messages
212
Likes
531
Suppose we took the same pair of Ananda's and:
First, ask Resolve/Andrew to repeat the measurements on his Gras
Second, yes it's a different rig entirely, but then ask @solderdude to also measure..

Might this help answer many of the questions previously posed? (Mismounting, 2019 aged pads, defective, etc. etc)

To me, the problems on Group Delay really stand out. How could all that he a seal issue? Yet if these 2019 phones have a zillion hours on them, you could entertain the possibility things could 'loosen up' - resulting in this.

Let's have others test the same phones..Certainly might be interesting..

Yes, unit variation is certainly a thing. At this point though it would be prudent to look at all the various measurements of the Ananda that are out in the wild and see which result is most common (at least the ones done on standardized rigs like the 43AG or 45CA etc.). I'm unaware of any specific revision for the Ananda, so yeah it's most likely either unit variation or an issue with the measurements going on here. I'd recommend looking at Crin's results on this for now.

*Edit: I missed the point about it being measured with an air gap. That explains why it looks like that.
 
Last edited:

Racheski

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 20, 2020
Messages
1,116
Likes
1,702
Location
Chicago
If Amir is so confident in his findings, send the same unit to @Resolve or @antdroid (Crin is too far) and see if they're the same.

Amir constantly challenges Jude to say where gear is sourced from in his reviews and yet he shouldn't be held to the same standards?
Sounds great. Please send a loaner pair to @cursive, pay the S&H, and collate the data. Report back to us when you are done.
 
Joined
Apr 9, 2021
Messages
5
Likes
16
Sounds great. Please send a loaner pair to @cursive, pay the S&H, and collate the data. Report back to us when you are done.

Headphones.com sends out headphones to their community as well as other reviewers on their own dime all the time so I'm sure they would have no problem paying shipping to have it go to Resolve.

For a prominent member of a forum that's all about science, you sure push back a lot against things that would produce scientific results.
 
Top Bottom