• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Fosi Audio SK-01 Headphone Amplifier Review

Rate this headphone amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 7 4.5%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 58 36.9%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 76 48.4%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 16 10.2%

  • Total voters
    157
Strange. If I interpret your exerpt from the spec sheet correctly, most of the data seen here have been improved (impedance of the DAC) and some improvements from the spec sheet of the successor have not even been listed by you: i.e. the DAC has changed from HyperStream® II DAC to HyperStream® IV Dual DAC etc.

>>The ES9039Q2M SABRE® DAC improves on previous designs to include: • TDM & SPI support for more options in connectively • Lower power consumption than previous generations which includes the Hyperstream IV DAC modulator • New hardware mode (HW) programmability alleviates I2C/SPI programming for ease of use...
<<

To the contrary the size of the corresponding new chip has increased :cool:
Hyperstream IV and DAC chip resistance changed from 706 to 390ohms! Oh, I missed those. Tthey are game changers. I think you are right, we should never buy any DAC that has anything less than 9039 if we truly care about music.
 
Why so aggressive ? I just wondered, why they have chosen an "old" chip for a brand new headphone amp design, if the "old" chip has already a successor ?
 
You were wondering why they are using an "outdated" chip. I asked you if you know what has improved in the new chips. You did not know. So I checked the data sheets and pointed out to you that the differences were non impactful. You responded by saying, and I misquote,"strange, you haven't mentioned these two very important changes" I imagine with a vocal fry maybe, despite the fact that you have no idea what they actual mean. I find that irritating.
 
Thanks for the test Amir. :) Nice features and ok performance for $80.

Loundness functionality I think is a great feature to have. At least if you occasionally listen at low volume. It would have been even better if the Fosi Audio SK-01 had variable loudness, but that's perhaps too much to ask for the $80 it costs.

Loudness or not is discussed in this interesting thread::)


I think that Amir also created some thread about the Fletcher Munson Curve, but I couldn't find it now.
I havent heard of variable loudness, what is that?
 
I havent heard of variable loudness, what is that?
Equal loudless compaensation is a feature that tries to make tonality more consistent when listening at very low or very high volumes.
You can look up fletcher munson curves, equal loudness contours, or ISO226 to learn more.

Ideally, this feature should be SPL referenced and be continuously variable to adapt to different SPLs.

The Fosi doesn't have that. It only has one fixed equal loudness compensation, for late night listening at low volumes.
 
"Loudness" describes indirectly the sensitivity of the human ear to the effects of different frequencies and sound pressures. The ears stays at medium frequencies with the highest sensitivity and looses this to the bass and (less) to the higher frquencies. depending on the sound pressure Your own age takes a toll here too for the highest frequencies, a 70 year old person hears (statistically) only just 8 kHz, a 40 year old about 13 kHz. There exists a formula for this...

The ISO norm 226:2003 describes this in detail (graphs). Fletcher / Munson detected this effect almost 100 years ago and it has been refined somewhat in the meantime by others. The "variable loudness compensation" creates a compensating profile so that the human ear will see those effected frequencies of same loudness even at lower sound pressures, because loudspeakers and earphones have their own efficiencies in presenting their output and human hearing varies individually a bit also, thus it should be "variable". "Old" implementations and less sophisticated ones simplify this and fix the loudness to an (statistically) expected mean, but it fails to be exact then.
The Fosi Audio SK01 has implemented a somewhat fixed loudness compensation curve and thus simplifies it often to the worse...
 
Last edited:
Equal loudless compaensation is a feature that tries to make tonality more consistent when listening at very low or very high volumes.
You can look up fletcher munson curves, equal loudness contours, or ISO226 to learn more.

Ideally, this feature should be SPL referenced and be continuously variable to adapt to different SPLs.

The Fosi doesn't have that. It only has one fixed equal loudness compensation, for late night listening at low volumes.
Thank you, so the fosi sk01 just for very low volumes, and the variable loudness is for both very low volumes and very high volumes.
 
"Loudness" describes indirectly the sensitivity of the human ear to the effects of different frequencies and sound pressures. The ears stays at medium frequencies with the highest sensitivity and looses this to the bass and (less) to the higher frquencies. depending on the sound pressure Your own age takes a toll here too for the highest frequencies, a 70 year old person hears (statistically) only just 8 kHz, a 40 year old about 13 kHz. There exists a formula for this...

The ISO norm 226:2003 describes this in detail (graphs). Fletcher / Munson detected this effect almost 100 years ago and it has been refined somewhat in the meantime by others. The "variable loudness compensation" creates a compensating profile so that the human ear will see those effected frequencies of same loudness even at lower sound pressures, because loudspeakers and earphones have their own efficiencies in presenting their output and human hearing varies individually a bit also, thus it should be "variable". "Old" implementations and less sophisticated ones simplify this and fix the loudness to an (statistically) expected mean, but it fails to be exact then.
The Fosi Audio SK01 has implemented a somewhat fixed loudness compensation curve and thus simplifies it often to the worse...
Is this the Fletcher-Munson curves? The lower sound pressure should gain more bass, so the variable loudness means different sound pressure should have different loudness curvers.
index.php
 
Because it is "fixed" it will work "spmehow" as intended just for low volumes. At higher volumes it is not useful because of the fixed adjustment. Thus it is not that useful and has to be disengaged manually then...
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know what class of amplifier the SK01 is?
 
Like many HPA's, class A. If it has the power, low distortion and features you require though, why would this matter?


JSmith
... because I hooked it in and my system sounds better even with tone defeat switched on. Not what I was expecting.
 
This is an interesting heaphone amp.
Currently, I am using full balanced system (Wiim Ultra, Matix Audio X-SPDIF3, SMSL M400 DAC, SMSL SP400 HPA, Sony MDR-M1)
Fiio BTR17 headphone amp for portable

But I am buying this for another casual RCA setup (maybe near my bed ? maybe on the office desk ? ha)

Combination :
Source > DDC > DAC > HPA > HP

Source: Android DMP for streaming/local playback (cost $79)

Screenshot 2025-01-12 041817.png


USB C Charging Hub (cost $18)

WhatsApp Image 2025-01-12 at 04.41.24_2d0c2e13.jpg


DDC: SMSL PO100 (cost $33)

WhatsApp Image 2025-01-12 at 04.41.24_fbc7be86.jpg


DAC: Coaxial to RCA coverter (cost $5 :cool:)

WhatsApp Image 2025-01-12 at 04.41.25_72b58e53.jpg


HPA: Fosi Audio SK-01 (cost $54 at my area)

WhatsApp Image 2025-01-12 at 04.41.26_2aefad51.jpg


wow~
Total 189
I get a mini stack and it really seems fun to play with
for the tone and loudness control.

wait ...
want a mini passive system ?
i found a mini class D pure power amp by Nobsound (cost only 30 from ali-express, including power supply, including shipping)
a perfect fit !

Seems like an advertisement ?
I really use it in that way :D

WhatsApp Image 2025-01-12 at 04.41.26_c41b81b6.jpg


 
Last edited:

This is a review, listening test and detailed measurements of the Fosi Audio SK-01 Headphone amp and preamplifier. It is was sent to me by the company and costs US $80.
View attachment 327699
You can quickly see what distinguishes the SK-01 from myriad of other headphone amps: inclusion of tone control and loudness! Such features were banished from hi-fi gear a few decades ago with the idea that an amplifier would be compromised with them. Never mind that you can and did have bypass switches.

The metal case is solid and rather heavy for its size due to inclusion of batteries. Power for charging is supplied through standard USB-C connector:
View attachment 327700
The Line out seems to just be connected to the headphone out but it is nice to have it in case you want to add tone controls to your stereo system.

Back to the battery, I wish there was a time out to shut the unit down. I left it on last night and it was dead in the morning. Fortunately once you connected the USB charger, it seems to be fully operational even with the dead battery. The battery by the way usually provides lower impedance than the charge port so it can improve performance of a headphone amp even if you don't need it for portability.

Overall, this is a solid offering, pun intended both from look and feel and functionality.

Fosi Audio SK-01 Measurements
Using our standard dashboard of unity gain (2 volts in/out) in low gain we get OK performance:
View attachment 327701

Performance is distortion limited as noise performance is quite good:
View attachment 327702

Even when turning on the tone controls, you have good headroom with respect to playing back 16 bit content. On the other hand, best to not use ultra sensitive IEMs as the noise performance there is about average:
View attachment 327703

View attachment 327704

Above is at 1 kHz, distortion does rise notably at lower frequencies (and some at high):
View attachment 327705

Here is our frequency response in different modes:
View attachment 327709
You can see the effect of loudness control at the set volume point in boosting mostly the bass.

Let's see how much power we have:
View attachment 327706
I like to see 100 milliwatts here and the SK-01 easily achieves that with 140 milliwatts so it should be good to drive high impedance headphones. Low impedance though is more limiting:
View attachment 327707

The indicator light blinks and shuts the output down. You can see this better as we sweep with different load impedances:
View attachment 327708

Channel matching is poor sadly, giving you another reason to avoid using IEMs:
View attachment 327710

Fosi Audio SK-01 Headphone Listening Tests
As usual, I started with my usual Dan Clark Audio Stealth headphone. This is a low impedance headphone that is difficult to drive. That instantly became a problem as the SK-01 struggled to even get to modest volume, constantly cutting in and out if I cranked the volume up at all.

Switching to Sennheiser HD-650 with its high impedance completely changed the picture. There was plenty of power to drive them to as loud as you wanted. Better yet, I was now able to turn up the bass control and compensate with lack of that in HD-650. There was now super enjoyable bass that survived my cranking up the volume to almost extreme levels! It put such a smile on my face. :)

I also tested the Loudness feature. It worked just like what I remembered from my system back in 1970s. You mostly notice the bass boost. At first you might think it is too much but then you turn off the control and the sound becomes so lackluster, at least on HD-650. Definitely a fun feature.

Conclusions
If this were an ordinary headphone amp, the objective performance would indicate a pass. But add tone controls without much noise penalty and that loudness control and you subjectively have a superior product to headphone amps with far lower noise and distortion. Many headphones need equalization to sound good and while having three pots won't give you the precision you want, you can still fix gross issues as I did with fixing the bass performance with HD-650. And since these are analog controls, you can quickly play with them unlike changing parameters in an EQ system which may glitch, have delay, etc.

I am going put the Fosi SK-01 headphone amplifier on my recommended list. I hope the company produces a higher priced one with better performance and that, would be a fantastic product to have.

Manufacturer Specifications:​

SpecificationsDetails
ModelSK01
Input3.5MM line in
Output3.5mm Headphone, 6.35mm Headphone, 3.5MM line out
Amp output maximum powerHigh Gain: RMS 2400mw/ 32Ω,Low Gain: RMS 300mw/32Ω
Frequency Range20Hz-20kHz (±0.5dB)
THD+N0.001% @ 1kHz and 770mV
SNR≥108dB
Headphone matching impedance16-300Ω
Device Dimension4.76*2*1.69inch (121*51*43mm)
Net Weight0.641b/290g
Power Supply5V, USB Type-C

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
@amirm I just asked the official engineers and they gave me some diagrams as they suggested that Fosi sk01 did support at 2.4W output with a 32ohm impedence load. They told me that they are able to demonstrate a 2.5W rated power and 3.1W maximum power (which already clipped the peak according to the waveform). Can you have a brief look?
 

Attachments

  • 3e22676f78702aeadfac5472b04a9c7d.jpg
    3e22676f78702aeadfac5472b04a9c7d.jpg
    208.4 KB · Views: 42
  • a4c1765dd0f0c93060280f980b4b6b4a.jpg
    a4c1765dd0f0c93060280f980b4b6b4a.jpg
    231.8 KB · Views: 45
Last edited:
@amirm I just asked the official engineers and they gave me some diagrams as they suggested that Fosi sk01 did support at 2.4W output with a 32ohm impedence load. They told me that they are able to demonstrate a 2.5W rated power and 3.1W maximum power (which already clipped the peak according to the waveform). Can you have a brief look?
The waveform on the left is heavily clipped. I measure power before that happens.
 
The waveform on the left is heavily clipped. I measure power before that happens.
Yes, the first picture shows 3.1W at 10% THD (heavily clipped) and the second 2.5W at 1% THD.

It's weird that they're not triggering protection like in your tests.
Maybe they're using shorter bursts?
 
Hi everyone. I’m a little thick. So what’s the upshot here? Is the sk01 a good, clean, transparent amplifier that can hold its own with the likes of iFi and Chord ( fill in your favorite high end dac/ amplifier here), or is it lacking in some serious way that relegates the sk01 to an interesting device that’s a lot of fun to use casually, but not for critical listening?
 
Back
Top Bottom