Polls are mainly just for fun.It's both "likely to improve sound quality" (100% because of placebo) and also a perfect example of "worthless audiophool sucker bait".
So I'm not really sure what good the poll does.
Perceived sound qualityYes, but "Worthless audiophool sucker bait" is going to get all the votes, and you know it
Except for a few pedantic voters who go "Weeell, technically the placebo effect does improve sound quality".
Helps with resonances.But... it's carbon fiber?![]()
Pure 60 Hz sine waves are just fine for my household power.
Ah, but if 50Hz, think how painful 60 must be.You are lucky. Iam sure 60Hz sound better. But here we have to live with 50Hz.
Perceived sound qualitynot actuall sq.
Do placebos have a half-life ? A measurement for these kind of product would be for how long the delusion lasts ?
But you caps get loaded much faster. And a A is 440Hz easy to hit with 60Hz, but how you do it with 50Hz?Ah, but if 50Hz, think how painful 60 must be.
S.
Ah, but if 50Hz, think how painful 60 must be.
S.
You haven't listed the price.Hey!! I'm wondering if anybody else spotted ads for these remarkable devices from Add/Powr?
I guaranty that not a few audiophiles with hear these devices and insist they hear sound quality improvements. Could you be persuaded?
![]()
If you have to ask you can't afford it.You haven't listed the price.
Obviously the expected audio improvement is related exponentially to purchase price.
You haven't listed the price.
Obviously the expected audio improvement is related exponentially to purchase price.