• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Excellent CD Masters

No breaking news here but Dr. John's Bluesiana Triangle CD sounds fantastic. Not sure if there's been a remix but the original release is stellar.

 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
No breaking news here but Dr. John's Bluesiana Triangle CD sounds fantastic. Not sure if there's been a remix but the original release is stellar.

There are two - the original and Bluesiana II. The follow up sounds even better.
 
Another one: Talk Talk, Natural Order 1982-1991.


R-4216104-1358816075-8718.jpg


This is a 2013 compilation with tracks selected by Mark Hollis to showcase "the other side" of Talk Talk, e.g. deep cuts, and is meant to accompany the more well-known Natural History compilation.

I find the mastering excellent - and those who don't like modern compression will especially like it. It pops a DR13 on the DR Meter, with two tracks DR11, two tracks DR15, and one DR17.

In particular, I find track 3, "For What It's Worth," to be a demo-quality track. The ambience and depth cues, along with the tightness and presence of the bass percussion, are IMHO outstanding.

Finally, for anyone interested in the band, this compilation is also unique in that it's the only one that includes at least one track from all five of their albums, including their finale Laughing Stock. And in that vein, it ends with a unique two-track sequence, where there's a direct segue between the Spirit of Eden track "Eden" and an edited alt. version of the Laughing Stock track "After the Flood."

Highly recommended.
 
Absolutely excellent mastered CDs .. there are many if someone is into Japanese Jazz Labels. :-)

Three Blind Mice label has some pretty amazing stuff with very high dynamic range.

Mari Nakamoto, isao Suzuki, ayako hosokawa, tsuyoshi Yamamoto, shigeko toys so many artists worth checking out :-)

 
Lyle Lovett's first 5 albums are to me some of the best sounding CD's of popular music, or any music for that matter. It shows what digitally recorded popular music could have been if not for the loudness wars. They have never been remastered and don't need to be. The used CDs are cheap and even the streaming versions are dynamic (they sound quiet compared to other music but just turn them up a little).
 
Miles Davis, Kind of Blue: Don't want to make this list all about audiophile discs, but same deal as Pet Sounds: I don't know that I've heard Davis' trumpet sound less distorted than it does on this mastering. My favorite among the approximately 8,000 different reissues of this album.
Hi there, Well, perhaps Miles' Trumpet isn't 'Distorted' but a few other instruments are !!

"So What" .... Distortion in both channels but particularly BAD and loud in the right channel on the backing horns !!
"Freddie Freeloader" ... Clear distortion, both channels from the start but mainly in the right channel. Plus you first get to hear the slightly 'dissonant' piano.
"Blue in Green" ... surprisingly not too bad, they must have adjusted the input gain,.. :rolleyes:;):D
"All Blues" ... there is some weird residual distortion in the right channel, but very noticeable distortion on the backing in the left channel, mainly at the beginning of the track and the piano almost sounds like it is 'clipping' the mic pre' towards the end, when the weird 'rattling' distortion returns in the right channel. It almost sounds like the instrument is filled with 'spittle' lol.
Early on, it would appear to simply be Too Much Level, into the console but later, it apparently has to do with a slightly 'dodgy' Noisy and distorting microphone, either capsule issues or psu/electronic issues ... Plus, unbelievably, the Piano is 'Out of Tune' !!
"Flamenco Sketches" ... if you listen very carefully, you can hear how certain areas of the Piano, are ever so slightly 'Out of Tune', not so much outright but within itself :confused:

If you have the corrected speed version the level of Miles' trumpet is seriously pushing the boundaries !! and I'd swear is 'clipping' something in the signal chain.
I6t was also this track when I first noticed the 'Tune' of the piano.

It matters Not, whether you have an Original Vinyl, CD or the later special 'corrected' speed CD, they are ALL from the Same 'Takes', ... there are NO 'Other' versions.
It WAS recorded onto 2 x machines, ... a Master & a 'Safety' copy but that is where and why the Speed issue arose, as the version initially pressed and used for years was from the machine that had the Speed, inadvertently & accidentally 'adjusted' ... ;):p

I have both an earlier "The Vinyl Classics" version and the later corrected speed release & had owned and listened to this for years and probably like Millions of others through time, Loved it.

I've been a Sound engineer for half my life and it honestly wasn't until I bought my new Fostex near field monitors for my computer setup and started 'Ripping' my CD's that I happened to notice the Severe distortion, especially in the Right channel,.. I honestly thought one of the Tweeters was having problems, until I put my headphones on.

It is such an 'Iconic' AND Fantastic album, I think we have all simply allowed ourselves to 'gloss-over' all the very noticeable Technical 'issues'. :)

BUT it can be a bit like a random 'squeak' or 'rattle' in your car,.. once you hear it ..... :confused:o_O

This is well documented and there is a great piece about it here:
https://audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/miles-davis-cd-kind-of-blue-with-distortion.617990/post-16656786

https://vinylhavenblog.wordpress.co...ind-of-blue-the-good-the-bad-and-the-awesome/
 
Last edited:
Lyle Lovett's first 5 albums are to me some of the best sounding CD's of popular music, or any music for that matter. It shows what digitally recorded popular music could have been if not for the loudness wars. They have never been remastered and don't need to be. The used CDs are cheap and even the streaming versions are dynamic (they sound quiet compared to other music but just turn them up a little).
Absolutely !! Great sound, / balance, Great musicians and playing and great ... Dynamics !!
In a Word, 'Excellent' !! :)
 
The 1984 CD release of Steely Dan - Aja.

MCA did a flat transfer of the original master tape.
And doesn't the Master sound SO Good !!??
Mmmmm as Rolling Stone once suggested, "A fine example of 'Dan under glass" LOL
 
Hi there, Well, perhaps Miles' Trumpet isn't 'Distorted' but a few other instruments are !!

"So What" .... Distortion in both channels but particularly BAD and loud in the right channel on the backing horns !!
"Freddie Freeloader" ... Clear distortion, both channels from the start but mainly in the right channel. Plus you first get to hear the slightly 'dissonant' piano.
"Blue in Green" ... surprisingly not too bad, they must have adjusted the input gain,.. :rolleyes:;):D
"All Blues" ... there is some weird residual distortion in the right channel, but very noticeable distortion on the backing in the left channel, mainly at the beginning of the track and the piano almost sounds like it is 'clipping' the mic pre' towards the end, when the weird 'rattling' distortion returns in the right channel. It almost sounds like the instrument is filled with 'spittle' lol.
Early on, it would appear to simply be Too Much Level, into the console but later, it apparently has to do with a slightly 'dodgy' Noisy and distorting microphone, either capsule issues or psu/electronic issues ... Plus, unbelievably, the Piano is 'Out of Tune' !!
"Flamenco Sketches" ... if you listen very carefully, you can hear how certain areas of the Piano, are ever so slightly 'Out of Tune', not so much outright but within itself :confused:

If you have the corrected speed version the level of Miles' trumpet is seriously pushing the boundaries !! and I'd swear is 'clipping' something in the signal chain.
I6t was also this track when I first noticed the 'Tune' of the piano.

It matters Not, whether you have an Original Vinyl, CD or the later special 'corrected' speed CD, they are ALL from the Same 'Takes', ... there are NO 'Other' versions.
It WAS recorded onto 2 x machines, ... a Master & a 'Safety' copy but that is where and why the Speed issue arose, as the version initially pressed and used for years was from the machine that had the Speed, inadvertently & accidentally 'adjusted' ... ;):p

I have both an earlier "The Vinyl Classics" version and the later corrected speed release & had owned and listened to this for years and probably like Millions of others through time, Loved it.

I've been a Sound engineer for half my life and it honestly wasn't until I bought my new Fostex near field monitors for my computer setup and started 'Ripping' my CD's that I happened to notice the Severe distortion, especially in the Right channel,.. I honestly thought one of the Tweeters was having problems, until I put my headphones on.

It is such an 'Iconic' AND Fantastic album, I think we have all simply allowed ourselves to 'gloss-over' all the very noticeable Technical 'issues'. :)

BUT it can be a bit like a random 'squeak' or 'rattle' in your car,.. once you hear it ..... :confused:o_O

This is well documented and there is a great piece about it here:
https://audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/miles-davis-cd-kind-of-blue-with-distortion.617990/post-16656786

https://vinylhavenblog.wordpress.co...ind-of-blue-the-good-the-bad-and-the-awesome/
This pure DSD version sounds excellent, but definitely will always have some distortion.. but also not a specific CD master :D

 
Last edited:
This pure DSD version sounds excellent, but definitely will always have some distortion.. but not a CD master :D

But what is the analogue source they used? From the site's "About Us" page, it appears they use "found" reel to reel tapes rather than, say, original master tapes.

For this Davis title, their web page identifies the source only as "Sourced from a 15ips 2-track tape." That could be anything.
 
And even if the CD title is in the database I can not be sure to get exactly this version CD or the album from streaming download.
H'mm could that be because the OP is orienting on the CD's, not streaming a song?
That is what I got out of it.
Perhaps I got that out of it because I don't stream. But, to my way of thinking, his statements seem to mean the "whole CD".
 
Last edited:
I was just listening to it earlier this evening.
Yeah, every now and then, (after not having listened to it in a while), you DO, ... it knocks your 'Socks Off' and you just sit there, literally 'Stunned' at How amazingly good the Playing & songs are, let alone how good the overall Sound is !!
Such a great collection of individual players !!
I'd have been a VERY Happy engineer, had I been involved in producing THAT outcome :):cool:
 
Last edited:
But what is the analogue source they used? From the site's "About Us" page, it appears they use "found" reel to reel tapes rather than, say, original master tapes.
For this Davis title, their web page identifies the source only as "Sourced from a 15ips 2-track tape." That could be anything.
Hmmm, well, I just listened to That version and I don't like it :confused:

Much like what has been 'suggested' on Many sites about the process of people 'Filtering' and trying to reduce the 1959 'Quality' from the Source to try and provide the new Digital, ours is best, Audiophile (expensive) copy, it sounds a bit weird,... in fact nothing like what I have, but typically the distortion, is Still there !!, .... lol

As a sound engineer, sometimes you wish people would just leave things alone and not 'mess' with things, seemingly believing They are capable of doing something that no one else has been able to previously,.. I care not about the 'Plug-In / Processor used,.. it's a 2 track,.. 15 ips, (I seriously doubt there would be anything else than a 15 ips copy), removing Anything, ... background Hiss, elements of noise etc from the Recorded Master, will have a change on the resultant output.

MILLIONS of people were and still are in Awe of this particular 'Album' and have been since 1959, (all listening to the available copies in the day), 'Warts and All', yet now in this Post, loudness Wars 'Digital' era, it is believed, We can 'Fix' it All,... lol .... Point is, do we really Want OR Need to !!?? :rolleyes::p

Let's face it, there are/were NOT Multiple 'Takes' !! That was Not how they did things 'back then'.
They may have 'run through the song' a few times, (but with that ensemble I somehow doubt it) and they played it 'live', then kept the version Miles was happy with.

So everything we have and Will hear, is ALL 'sourced' from the same material / Master tapes, there are No 'Hidden' Better copies, apart from the Speed differences from the Secondary 2 track 'Safety' copy and it took them literally Ages to discover that :D
 
My copy of Kind of Blue is a Sony Super Bit mapping gold CD. Sounds better than most versions. Cannonball Adderly's Somethin' Else album is very good. Recorded a year before Kind of Blue by Rudy Van Gelder. Davis plays on several of the tracks and Adderly is who played sax on Kind of Blue. While excellent itself and maybe a better recording, it isn't as wonderful as Kind of Blue.
 
Last edited:
My copy of Kind of Blue is a MoFi Super Bit mapping gold CD. Sounds better than most versions. Cannonball Adderly's Somethin' Else album is very good. Recorded a year before kind of blue by Rudy Van Gelder. Davis plays on several of the tracks and Adderly is who played sax on Kind of Blue. While excellent itself and maybe a better recording, it isn't as wonderful as Kind of Blue.
Kind of Blue really nails it till about the middle of the CD and then I think gets a lil too mellow.
 
But what is the analogue source they used? From the site's "About Us" page, it appears they use "found" reel to reel tapes rather than, say, original master tapes.

For this Davis title, their web page identifies the source only as "Sourced from a 15ips 2-track tape." That could be anything.
Had a question about one of your older comments in this thread. You were saying some releases were Remixes, but not remasters. Speaking about Steve Wilson Yes remixes. How can you have a remix without also doing a remaster? Perhaps you meant to differentiate between re-masters using original mixes vs remixes (which will require a new mastering as well).
 
As a sound engineer, sometimes you wish people would just leave things alone and not 'mess' with things, seemingly believing They are capable of doing something that no one else has been able to previously,

IMO, the entire "remastering" scene is more about mining the back catalogues, some clown fiddles with/ruins and then re-releases in order to get true followers to buy yet another copy of something they bought 20+ years before, sell to young people as something 'better' and simply capitalise on the retro/classic bandwagon.

The original releases are the standard. Anything else is usually a mess in my experience. The collector value is all in the original CD releases- nobody really cares about endless re-masters full of squashed dynamics, truncated lead-in/outs and spectral changes (EQ mostly). Sure, some 80s classic albums were a bit light on bottom end. That was until they worked out how far and deep digital recorded bass could be. Then it became an arms race.

Take Dire Straights for example. The original album CDs haven't been bettered. Apart from an early Love Over Gold with excess tape hiss (part of the charm), they've (remasters) made everything worse. And the compilation albums are trash. I wish they weren't but they are.

Jean Michel Jarre's Oxymore (2022) is an incredible sonic achievement. Mastered in multichannel/binaural/stereo/Atmos and the CD has a code to access the highest quality binaural download as a bonus (I haven't done that yet). If you like Jarre, it'll be a bit of a difficult one at first, but it's growing on me. Much like Zoolook broke the mold in 1984, but went on to be a favorite. Plenty of reminders of all his previous work buried in the soundscape of Oxymore.
 
Back
Top Bottom