solderdude
Grand Contributor
It's based on the very well tuned Oppo PM3. I've seen multiple users report that this new model is a regression in sound quality and Amirs measurements confirm it.
Panda vs PM3 on Sonarworks rig.
It's based on the very well tuned Oppo PM3. I've seen multiple users report that this new model is a regression in sound quality and Amirs measurements confirm it.
The sync point is just for visual niceness. It has no other meaning. In the Frequency Response Deviation from Target graph the location of the emphasised line at 0dB isn't meaningful at all. What matters is how far from flat the measured lines are, not their absolute position. Choosing a different reference point just shifts the reference line, but does not change the deviation from flatness.Would this review change in any way if the sync was at 1khz instead of 425, and the EQ bringing down the resultant boost at 80 - 700 hz?
Great, it will be a valuable measurement.In this case it doesn't have a DSP and it is in bypass mode anyway so doesn't have latency. But sure, I can do that in the case of the ones with DSP and hence pipeline delay.
doesn’t all bluetooth headphones have latency, DSP or not?In this case it doesn't have a DSP and it is in bypass mode anyway so doesn't have latency. But sure, I can do that in the case of the ones with DSP and hence pipeline delay.
Might be tricky to measure due to dynamic EQ.*Patiently awaits AirPod pro max review………
Might be tricky to measure due to dynamic EQ.
My goto pair is an ATH- M50X with a Fiio BTA10 adapter. Sounds really good but the battery life isn't great. AT has a bt focused version now.I don't feel so bad. I paid 200usd and at that price, they just went to the woodshop where headphones eventually go to die, but the sound isolation is good enough to use to muffle some power tools.
I really hope I don't have to go Bose just for some good sounding BT cans. I'm old enough to have some bad memories of that brand.
In this case it doesn't have a DSP and it is in bypass mode anyway so doesn't have latency. But sure, I can do that in the case of the ones with DSP and hence pipeline delay.
Probably a big increase in distortion.Is there something that can explain why they do not sound good post EQ? Because post EQ they should objectively match the target FR, have low distortion and no weirdness in the group delay plot
Probably not the reason though, distortion is still low under the 114dB distortion plot, and the EQ would at most boost certain regions by 7.5dB. there should be enough headroom to keep the distortion under controlProbably a big increase in distortion.
My EQ efforts are rather short and done by eye. If I can't get close to the target easily, then I give up. In this case, I managed to substantially improve the performance but at then, just didn't get to a place I wanted.Is there something that can explain why they do not sound good post EQ? Because post EQ they should objectively match the target FR, have low distortion and no weirdness in the group delay plot
Welcome Aboard @Airquotes.I actually liked the way these sounded and found them very comfortable on my tiny head. My problem came from how incredibly broken the firmware on them is. My first pair bricked, came back to life, bricked again, stopped working on the computer, stopped connecting, just all kinds of stuff. Finally RMAd them after getting truly fed up and unable to update the firmware on them. 2nd pair (BNIB) turned on once then never turned on again. Requested a refund which thankfully they obliged. I think they underestimated how hard it is to write proper firmware and knew they were pushing out a broken product. If you check the Drop forums it's one story after another of connection problems and dead headphones. They just aren't ready for release yet.