Despite agreeing with some disconcerting signs over design, remains to be seen if that translates into reliability issues for either Hypex or Purifi. Given their very comparable overall design is there any indication that Purifi's module is really better? Having both the Purifi 1ET400A and the NCx500 in hand, can tell you the output device heatsinking for them is identical as far as I can see.
Unless some field quality metrics are obtained, with the number of members buying one or the other (or both), ASR member experiences are likely to reflect at some point in the future! In a back door sort of way, we may become a reliability experiment for these products.
In any case, no electronics manufacturer who wants to stay in business plans to have a major customer reliability problem. Yes, they are bound to happen as we have seen with the bigger manufacturers. Purifi is relatively young but Hypex has been around for decades. If the designs are so unreliable, would companies like NAD or ATI be integrating them? Maybe, but I doubt it.