Marc v E
Major Contributor
I understand your point.How does that solve the problem of people naturally being more likely to report a problem than report not having a problem? Look at the topping PA5 thread. There are enough failure reports to indicate there is an issue, but we still have no idea what the failure rate is since anyone with a problem will goolgle for it, find that thread, and post their issue. Even then we are only able to detect a serious problem. If the failure rate was a more typical <2% we'd not have any data on it, other than one or two disgruntled members which could easily be a random distribution variation.
With 7000 people you'd have no meaningful data ever. Product sales life is generally only a few years at the volume end of the market. People are generally not changing their kit every few years, and we are a tiny part of the market. Even if they do change their kit regularly then you get no data on long term reliability.
You can't get any information on reliability without data only the manufacturer has - how many units have been sold - how many have been returned failed.
What I'm suggesting is that instead of guessing and getting all emotional in a thread about 1 certain issue, we will get more dependable data if a langer number of ASR members have a central place where they can deposit their data all the time. It might be anecdotal evidence in the beginning, but better in the longer run.
It's a shame to dismiss this chance in the name of accuracy if we can get more accurate data than we have now.
Last edited: