Vacceo
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2022
- Messages
- 2,682
- Likes
- 2,833
I guess the hard cap is on the phisical capabilities of the speaker itself.You don't really think one can replicate the sound of all the different speakers out there with EQ, do you?
Poor in terms of lots of extra noise and sound other than instruments themselves; saturated microphones, low dynamic range, compressed sound... I reckon that some producers have made those elements a trademark of what they create, Scott Burns is a good example.This is a bit confusing though.
You say it's a poor recording. What makes it "poor" if not that it sounds "poor?"
If it sounds good on both your speakers and in a professional studio, why call it a "poor" recording?
(And then of course we are simply moving the subjective call to rating recordings...)
Those could be measureable elements of the recording whereas liking the result or not is up to the listener. What I call "good speakers" would make those elements evident.