litemotiv
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2021
- Messages
- 318
- Likes
- 589
exactly what i meant (sterile), it sounds somehow too clean, as if it was AI upscaled.
There is no reason for Amazon to mess with the sound, there are several reasons for this.
First the sound could only be altered by processing the actual source files, since the streams themselves are application agnostic. The entire catalog is owned and managed by the rights holders, being the record labels and/or artists. The rights holders would never allow a third party, in this case Amazon, to mess with their property and potentially degrade the sound quality. It would be a legal minefield for Amazon to engage in any type of processing, there is no reason why they would want to alter incredibly well known material from e.g. The Beatles, Michael Jackson or other iconic artists, there is nothing to gain for them by doing that.
Second it would take an enormous amount of recurring processing for no benefit. There are 75+ million tracks on Amazon, many thousands more are uploaded every day, and constantly processing all this material would be very costly. Ofcourse Amazon has the processing power to do this, but economically they have no incentive to do so. Storage is cheap but CPU cycles are not.
Amazon Music is a streaming network, they are not in the business of remastering or post-processing material that was already painstakingly prepared by the rights holders themselves. They will very gladly not touch the material in any way, because only then can they not be held accountable for the quality of the tracks. They can just point to the labels/artists for anything related to sound quality, which is the best position for them to be in.
(the same applies to all the other streaming platforms ofcourse)