I believe that most of the people here have come to the conclusion that the direction taken by High End Audio, that of selling High Price Luxury items with sound editorializing features isn't right. We(there are a few reactionary) have chosen science to guide us to better sound or at least to show us the way to better sound.
This means at times to strive for measurements that correlate with perception and particuylary to fnd simple ways or articles that verify the validity of some perceptions. I came to understand recently how strong the Placebo Effect is. I am citing this
article from Science Daily (please click here)
According to recent research the color, shape, taste and even name of a tablet or pill can have an effect on how patients feel about their medication. Choose an appropriate combination and the placebo effect gives the pill a boost, improves outcomes and might even reduce side effects.
. If our perceptions work to make a simple sugar pill to some level of effectiveness on a physiological level, you can imagine how they work against us when auditioning audio component, under the full assault of our biases: Brand, appearance, surroundings, friends opinions, mood, etc.. We are more gullible than we want to believe.
This forum which strive to establish a balance between the perceived and Science and ways to achieve better sound is needed. Most needed. I wouldn't want it to become an Hydrogenaudio type, where any observation seems to be shot down once it doesn't fit a certain "scientific" orthodoxy. I would want it to be lively , to access the debates to understand why we like what we like, how to achieve better sound within a given budget ..and other constraints ... partner/spouse acceptance factor and aesthetics are not to be taken lightly... How to use Science and technology to achieve better sound. On this I may acquire a pair of speakers in the very near future, have not heard them yet but the debate is between Geddes Abbey and Danley Audio Labs Synergy at this point in time.. A YUUUGE departure from a person who until recently was looking at Magico Q3 and other audiophile darlings. It could well be an interim speaker, I must say that JBL M2. the 4367 and some other JBL models, mainly the Synthesis Series (the K2 S9900 and the 1400 array or even an older model such as the M9500) for example are still in the (future?)running as well as the Geddes Summa. I am willing to take the risk of buying sight unseen. A leap of faith .... based on a belief in Science
and this forum is the right place for those who believe
We need to find ways to increase membership. We need to attract industry luminaries. I would like to see Earl Geddes, Tom Danley, Duke Lejeune, The Harman people, JJ, etc ( I apologize to those I haven't mentioned) and other researchers in the Science of Audio and of its Art to post here. They should be invited and encouraged to join the discussions. I also believe a gentler tone and more acceptant attitude will help. On my side , I will likely continue to (try to
) shoot down or ignore the ramblings of some
I believe that we need to embark on a campaign to increase membership and strive for diversity, to have more people questioning or defending the current status quo of High End Audio. We will then become a more useful forum.
My 1 Gourde ( Haitian currency) go
Here to have the USD equivalent