Take it like this: If you are looking for a cheap bluetooth headphone, fairly good measurement for the price, ANC, long battery life, acceptable with EQ and without high expectations, this can be recommended.
When it comes to Trio, for the price point and technicality it is not any better then U12t which is recommended.
That is a sensible way to look at it.
Until you start thinking about it a bit more and then it becomes a bit less sensible in my opinion.
Lets take this hypothetical for a moment, imagine based on this review sales of this product increased and price went up to $129, would it still be a good product for the price? How about $199? At what price this headphone would stop being a good value for money and recommendation? When you are looking at Trio, you are comparing it to U12T performance and price. Fair enough. And what other cheap headphones are you taking into consideration when you say this can be recommended for what it is?
For electronics, you look at 5-6 data points that are important for you, and say if a DAC is transparent, it is objectively transparent, pricing, competition, etc. will not change that. People can than decide whether they are willing to pay the money the manufacturer is asking for themselves and that is perfectly fine. But whether a product is recommended or not depends on its price point, and what other products are available in that price bracket/from the same brand currently, than is means review is not objective, it is Amir's opinion based on his current understanding of the category and his personal taste of the sound after EQ, doesn't it? How is this review is any less subjective then any other headphone review that refers to measurements when reviewing the headphones? Or maybe there is no such claim for objectivity for headphone reviews and all these ultra-objectivists I have been talking to lately are confusing me?
Speaking of which, where are they btw, they were very keen to jump on the bash the expensive product bandwagon. None seems to be around to defend the Harman curve for the cheap product. I believe that to be objectively interesting.