Oh, come on, not this argument again... I will only make one post on this.
Audio is a very subjective domain because not only it rests on sensory perception which differs person-by-person but on one's ability to convert sensations into words (reviews, testimonies etc.). So what's true for one may not be true for the other, or that person might be fooling himself and the other (intentional or not), or his wording is too hyped, or the other person misinterpreted his words because they have different mindset for words etc etc.. To cut things short, subjective listening testimonies are only helpful if you comprehend very well the Point of View (or frame of reference) of the other person. This is obtainable only if you've listened to something exactly the same under the same conditions as that person. Then you may compare his subjective impressions and yours and get a frame of reference which you then can interpolate on his other testimonies to get approximate understanding of what your impressions would be. Then you begin collecting other people's impressions to collect a statistical data which will either confirm or deny facts stated in those impressions. It is a pretty universally accepted opinion (if you read the Internet) that DX200 + AMP4's soundstage is phenomenal.
In my original post I specifically stated that I've heard the iBasso DX200 with the stock amp and was able to devise a frame of reference (for myself) to confirm that what is being said about it and AMP4 is (most probably) true. You can take this argument as just my opinion without any hard evidence, I frankly couldn't care less if you buy this player or not. I don't understand why everyone's so edgy about that thing I said.
Gross exxageration. Not really a relevant example in this case as reports on audio equipment can be tested on a person-by-person basis.
Really, it was never my intention to be "edgy" - I simply vote against using argumentum ad populum as an argument in general, not to the equipment you've being mentioning. The truth is that educated people are always minority so if you introduce numbers as an argument logic and science will always loose.