• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping D30Pro Review (Balanced DAC)

Pan

Member
Joined
May 2, 2021
Messages
15
Likes
7
It's actually not incredibly hard to reproduce, as I just found. Just set the sample rate to 384kHz, bit depth doesn't matter. I put my phone to my headphone's ear cup to record it, here it is, an intermittent static buzz, for lack of a better description: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AptJOzTSXgG6ns8hqFQwKrcB6j0m4A

Is this what the rest of you are hearing? You may have to turn the volume up. Recorded while watching a YouTube video. Any clues what may be happening here, @JohnYang1997 ?
Sounds exactly like mine.
 

jmillar

Active Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2020
Messages
178
Likes
140
But that's not soundstage, that's simply channel separation. So unless you want to say channel separation is soundstage, then I suppose that's not what I assumed one talks about.

And when you say "less distortion and noise floor" increases soundstage. Well that's fine, but that then makes soundstage entailed by other concepts, but in tandem amount to a newly combined term like "soundstage". But if that's the case, then zero distortion and noise = maximum soundstage? So if I am playing a recording doing mono, or playing a recording done in a church binuarally (or lets say 7.1 surround sound). Both of them would have identical and maximum soundstage so as long as they both had something like zero noise and distortion hypothetically?

See why it's problematic speaking about soundstage in this way?

Soundstage is the 3D illusion derived from the use of two amps and two speakers. "Stereoscopic" effect is the reason we buy twice as much electronics than absolutely necessary. The fact that we can't measure it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The best experience so far is to use headphones to listen to an (excellent) binaural recording. The feeling of "being there" and actually locating where each sound seems to be coming from is truly amazing and a real "eye opener". (But of course, binaural headphone listening is a VERY niche market.) But what some marketing people call "holographic" sound (the word "stereoscopic" seems to have lost its sheen) is the core reason we buy "two of everything" in a modern sound system.

The fact that we don't (yet) know how to measure it or find a useful proxy for it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist and that we are not already "paying for the privilege" and buying electronics in pairs. If "imaging" is what it's supposed to do, it should do it well.
 
Last edited:

aandres_gm

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2021
Messages
311
Likes
353
Location
Germany
Thinking about sending it back, not sure if I want a replacement, because chances are it will do the same thing.
 

Mulder

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Messages
642
Likes
891
Location
Gothenburg, Sweden
The noise error appears to be related to some copies of the D30Pro. It seems to be a manufacturing defect rather than a design defect. I do not have this problem with my D30Pro.
 

chris719

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
373
Likes
423
I am not sure if this is a defect or what, but CS43198 doesn't really have what I would consider to be a functional digital filter at 384 kHz. I would not recommend using 384 kHz sample rate if you care about quality.
 

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,599
Likes
12,041
I am not sure if this is a defect or what, but CS43198 doesn't really have what I would consider to be a functional digital filter at 384 kHz. I would not recommend using 384 kHz sample rate if you care about quality.
Interesting.
 

chris719

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
373
Likes
423
Interesting.

Page 130 of the datasheet shows the response in octuple speed mode (384 kHz). Apparently AK4490/3 behave similarly above 192 kHz. Not sure about AK4499 or ES90xx. I think this is why it would be nice to see just a couple tests at higher sample rates, because some people actually use them even if they don't bring audible benefit.
 

Mulder

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 2, 2020
Messages
642
Likes
891
Location
Gothenburg, Sweden
Page 130 of the datasheet shows the response in octuple speed mode (384 kHz). Apparently AK4490/3 behave similarly above 192 kHz. Not sure about AK4499 or ES90xx. I think this is why it would be nice to see just a couple tests at higher sample rates, because some people actually use them even if they don't bring audible benefit.
In the latest firmware update (2.44) a number of completely new filters were added, which from what I understand is not in the chip itself but is an addition made by Topping. How do they work compared to the filters that connect to the chip itself?
 

chris719

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
373
Likes
423
In the latest firmware update (2.44) a number of completely new filters were added, which from what I understand is not in the chip itself but is an addition made by Topping. How do they work compared to the filters that connect to the chip itself?

Almost guaranteed they are in the chip; it just lets you program custom coefficients. If you don't see a separate DSP or FPGA on the board, it's very unlikely to be external. The CS43198 doesn't actually have an external filter input mode, which makes it even more likely that these filters are just updated coefficients. I suppose you could use an external filter and run the chip at 384 kHz, which is essentially equivalent to a digital filter bypass mode, but I don't know what the performance implications would be. It already shows slightly worse measurements at 192 kHz.
 
Last edited:

JohnYang1997

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
7,175
Likes
18,300
Location
China
33111b9e56539428.jpg
-235d4ec151de4c35.jpg
 

aandres_gm

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2021
Messages
311
Likes
353
Location
Germany
I'd really appreciate your input on this noise issue some of us are experiencing. Can we pin this on a defective unit, is the DAC not playing nice with Windows?
 

JohnYang1997

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
7,175
Likes
18,300
Location
China
I'd really appreciate your input on this noise issue some of us are experiencing. Can we pin this on a defective unit, is the DAC not playing nice with Windows?
We are preparing a firmware update. Hopefully it will fix the 384KHz play back issue for everyone.

For those who are thinking returning the unit, I'm not here to say these things to stop you from returning. You gotta do what you gotta do. If you believe in us, you can hold on to it and wait for the update.
 

aandres_gm

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2021
Messages
311
Likes
353
Location
Germany
We are preparing a firmware update. Hopefully it will fix the 384KHz play back issue for everyone.

For those who are thinking returning the unit, I'm not here to say these things to stop you from returning. You gotta do what you gotta do. If you believe in us, you can hold on to it and wait for the update.
I've said before I bought Topping because of this kind of openness and interaction with the customers. I really liked this from FiiO back in the day, really like it now, so I'll wait. Hopefully the update will fix it!
 

Pan

Member
Joined
May 2, 2021
Messages
15
Likes
7
The noise error appears to be related to some copies of the D30Pro. It seems to be a manufacturing defect rather than a design defect. I do not have this problem with my D30Pro.
Sometimes it takes 3 to 4 hours to appear.
 

Pan

Member
Joined
May 2, 2021
Messages
15
Likes
7
We are preparing a firmware update. Hopefully it will fix the 384KHz play back issue for everyone.

For those who are thinking returning the unit, I'm not here to say these things to stop you from returning. You gotta do what you gotta do. If you believe in us, you can hold on to it and wait for the update.
I'm keeping this if this is a software issue and it can be solved by firmware. Thank you for replying in this forum, much appreciate your support.
 

Boxenbau

New Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Messages
3
Likes
3
We are preparing a firmware update. Hopefully it will fix the 384KHz play back issue for everyone.

For those who are thinking returning the unit, I'm not here to say these things to stop you from returning. You gotta do what you gotta do. If you believe in us, you can hold on to it and wait for the update.
Hello John, may this Firmware Update also solve the music interruption issue which some (including me) reported?
Thank you! BR, Christian
 

JohnYang1997

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Audio Company
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
7,175
Likes
18,300
Location
China
Hello John, may this Firmware Update also solve the music interruption issue which some (including me) reported?
Thank you! BR, Christian
If it's the issue with COAX or TOSLINK and CD player, sorry no.
 

sindri1980

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2019
Messages
5
Likes
1
Hi @JohnYang1997, sorry for hijacking the current conversation, but I was wondering if it would be possible to offer a firmware update to enable UAC1 mode in this DAC so that it can be used natively with the PS5/Nintendo Switch :)
That would be super nice and I'm sure that a lot of gamers interested in a high-performing DAC solution would be happy to get this unit.
 

Veri

Master Contributor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
9,599
Likes
12,041
Hi @JohnYang1997, sorry for hijacking the current conversation, but I was wondering if it would be possible to offer a firmware update to enable UAC1 mode in this DAC so that it can be used natively with the PS5/Nintendo Switch :)
From what I gather from the JDS Atom DAC and its UAC1 firmware, once you flash UAC1 you lose the possibility to re-flash firmware, so you can't go back to UAC2 firmware. That's a bit annoying, especially when buying second-hand you might end up with such a 'permanent' UAC1 unit. I can see why not many companies support such an operation.
 
Top Bottom