guildenstern
Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2020
- Messages
- 42
- Likes
- 48
The new coming D10 variation will only support Balanced output.
Any news on when this new D10-balanced-version will be available in US?
The new coming D10 variation will only support Balanced output.
And the truth will set you free...[...] but at the end of the day the sound I personally hear between both is so stinkin' close (if not the same) that if it's not a tie, it may as well be. Any possible differences would be so tiny and subtle as to be personally irrelevant compared to any other part of the chain. I know this isn't news to most folks on this forum, but it was nice to finally hear this for myself.
Is the subject serving as an ADuM4160, a USB port isolator based on Analog Devices' i Coupler® technology?..
Or is it otherwise galvanically decoupled from the computer?
-the teardown link is original D10 not D10sI'm new here. My knowledge of electronics is basic. I recently bought Topping D10s. My question is about replacing Op-amps. I'm not sure that I understand it correctly but in description of this DAC from shenzhenaudio is that it have OPA2134. But in my D10s is LME49720NA.
I found this:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...ng-replacing-op-amps-in-topping-d10-dac.4576/
In conclusions I found info that OPA2134 is the best.
I will try to investigate with sellers this why I have LME49720NA in my both D10s. I bought them from 2 separate sources in last a few weeks.
But in the meantime I would like to "upgrade" my D10s to OPA2134. Could please someone tell me what exact full name should have this OPA2134.
Also what is the difference between them?
So far I discovered that it is price difference OPA2134 is more expensive and it is from Texas Instruments / Burr-Brown.
Thank you for any help.
-the teardown link is original D10 not D10s
-the 47920 is also a burr brown/TI part as far as I know
They are similar enough for use as a buffer in D10s that's for sure. So yes, suitable replacement.What is the difference between LME49720NA and OPA2134? Are they replacement or equivalent?
Thank you. I will do my home work and will try to find pdf spec for both of them and compare.They are similar enough for use as a buffer in D10s that's for sure. So yes, suitable replacement.
Not good idea.I'm new here. My knowledge of electronics is basic. .
Please don't buy many opamps to swap around, it's a waste of time btw; I disagree with zenon aboveThank you. I will do my home work and will try to find pdf spec for both of them and compare.
What makes you say this? It's one of Texas Instruments' best new chips really, works very well in many applications.OPA1656 is not suitable, or at least not in this buffer variant.
Not good idea.
OPA2134 is mediocre quality today.
The best sound, from the experiments I have done so far, were ADA4898-2 and OPA1612.
OPA1656 is not suitable, or at least not in this buffer variant.
But, it's best for you to figure out how you like the sound the most.
Please don't buy many opamps ...