- Thread Starter
- #21
So you measured that ground bond resistance and can post it here for us and how you instrumented it?The chassis ground is there. You just can't see it.
Like I said it's all well within CE compliences.
So you measured that ground bond resistance and can post it here for us and how you instrumented it?The chassis ground is there. You just can't see it.
Like I said it's all well within CE compliences.
And I am asking about those exact numbers Mike:Yes I talk about numbers that matter.
So you measured that ground bond resistance and can post it here for us and how you instrumented it?
And I am asking about those exact numbers Mike:
Where any of these numbers measured by you in your finished product?
I hear you. I am asking if those components once placed in your real product with different wiring, implementation etc. than the vendor used, produces the same numbers. Do you have any such measurements of your product?Yes I talk about the numbers that contribute to the product sounding as good as it does. I could use far worse quality components inside, and analog measurements using industry standards would be almost the same. But certainly not the sound.
I hear you. I am asking if those components once placed in your real product with different wiring, implementation etc. than the vendor used, produces the same numbers. Do you have any such measurements of your product?
LOLI sure do, but sharing them will only mislead my intended client base. Music and great sound lovers. Some folks think these industry standard tests are everything. And if they see how good my DAC measurements are, I'd end up wasting my DAC's on clients who are deaf, instead of folks who will enjoy it for the sound.
You mean putting all of those numbers already on your web site doesn't mislead them even though they are for the parts and not the equipment they are buying, but the real numbers you get in your implementation would?I sure do, but sharing them will only mislead my intended client base.
LOL
Mike a simple "No" would of sufficed.
You mean putting all of those numbers already on your web site doesn't mislead them even though they are for the parts and not the equipment they are buying, but the real numbers you get in your implementation would?
But you did throw all of these numbers at them, right?No because anyone who has enough knowledge to know what matters, will understand the build is excellent. I like knowledgable people, just not forum educated numbers mongers. So my products are for music listeners, or professionals only.
But you did throw all of these numbers at them, right?
That is a big, big part of the write up for the product. You are working super hard to sell the product by numbers. Those numbers.
I am asking if you have actually measured anything with regards to those numbers in your real product.
Sounds like you have not and are hoping to mislead your potential customers with part specs vs reality.
There is nothing flawless about your product. But let's say it is. You can show that the part spec = product spec. Take one of those measurements and demonstrate that.Yes and I share that info because anyone with the knowledge to understand what matters, will understand this combination of components, as well as the flawless board layouts will result in incredible performance.
There is nothing flawless about your product. But let's say it is. You can show that the part spec = product spec. Take one of those measurements and demonstrate that.
We are not talking about those claims Mike. I am asking about objective set of numbers you list -- tons of them -- on your web site.The product is built to extremely high standards in every department. Every single one of the owners who bought the Purestream besides 1 guy said it was by far the best sound they ever heard from a DAC. And that 1 DAC it couldn't quite match is $90000.
I don't buy your representation of anything Mike. You are often not truthful.YOU'RE NOT TEACHING ME ANYTHING, AND MY OEM CLIENTS ARE ONLY LAUGHING AT YOU. ALL CLIENTS WHO OWN PURESTREAM'S ARE PERFECTLY HAPPY WITH THE DESIGN, AND HAVE NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT. THEY ARE SMART PEOPLE.
We are not talking about those claims Mike. I am asking about objective set of numbers you list -- tons of them -- on your web site.
I don't think I have ever seen so many numbers thrown out for a DAC. So clearly you are trying to sell on that basis.
My question remains: are any of those numbers verified for a finished, built product?
I don't buy your representation of anything Mike. You are often not truthful.
If those people want to help you they should come here and defend the points I made in my original article.
We figured that much so far.I've made it clear that I'm not sharing these measurements.
Well I thought they valued helping your credibility. Seems like they don't value that either.Sorry but those guys wouldn't give a second of their time to increase your forum traffic.