What headphones did Vincent van Gogh use?I think Dave showed data from 3 independent studies on how much you lose cutting out the individuals ears.
What headphones did Vincent van Gogh use?I think Dave showed data from 3 independent studies on how much you lose cutting out the individuals ears.
Scroll back a bit and you’ll see that SonarWorks are investigatingIt’s funny, copyright was introduced into English common law in the Victorian era precisely to prevent this troll like behaviour. In the US and to a degree the U.K. the state has been coopted by Disney et al to strangle commercial competition. I have no idea what sonar works think they are achieving by this as they are hardly consequential players in the copyright world, but they have successfully failed in front of the entire internet.
Hey all,
TL;DR - the DMCA take-down notice was sent out by our 3rd party service provider in error and will be retracted as soon as Google processes it. ASR is now whitelisted and this should not happen again.
Long version: I investigated this issue and found out that our service provider (SP) did in fact sent this notice on behalf of Sonarworks. I contacted the SP, and they responded that this should not have happened and is currently investigated. It was possibly a human error, but there's no confirmation yet.
We use the service only to scan for pirated content - torrents, cracks, keygens - because it directly impacts our business.
We do not use the service or any other means to take action against articles, reviews, forum posts, blog posts or any other entries that merely discusses, reviews, critiques or posts information/screenshots/videos of our software.
So this should not have happened, and I apologize on behalf of Sonarworks that this has happened.
Our SP has submitted a retraction to Google regarding this notice. It will be processed by Google within 3-7 business days. There's an additional 10 day legal waiting period - as far as I understand, it can be used for counter-claims. Furthermore, the SP will investigate how this happened and make sure it doesn't repeat in the future.
I hope I have cleared the air on this unfortunate matter. Let me know if there's anything left unanswered!
Also, I sent an apology to Amir regarding the lack of response to the original message addressed to Sonarworks. The message got stuck in the pipe-line, which should never happen. I've raised the issue with my colleagues so we can avoid such issues in the future.
Hey all,
TL;DR - the DMCA take-down notice was sent out by our 3rd party service provider in error and will be retracted as soon as Google processes it. ASR is now whitelisted and this should not happen again.
Long version: I investigated this issue and found out that our service provider (SP) did in fact sent this notice on behalf of Sonarworks. I contacted the SP, and they responded that this should not have happened and is currently investigated. It was possibly a human error, but there's no confirmation yet.
We use the service only to scan for pirated content - torrents, cracks, keygens - because it directly impacts our business.
We do not use the service or any other means to take action against articles, reviews, forum posts, blog posts or any other entries that merely discusses, reviews, critiques or posts information/screenshots/videos of our software.
So this should not have happened, and I apologize on behalf of Sonarworks that this has happened.
Our SP has submitted a retraction to Google regarding this notice. It will be processed by Google within 3-7 business days. There's an additional 10 day legal waiting period - as far as I understand, it can be used for counter-claims. Furthermore, the SP will investigate how this happened and make sure it doesn't repeat in the future.
I hope I have cleared the air on this unfortunate matter. Let me know if there's anything left unanswered!
Also, I sent an apology to Amir regarding the lack of response to the original message addressed to Sonarworks. The message got stuck in the pipe-line, which should never happen. I've raised the issue with my colleagues so we can avoid such issues in the future.
This thread should be deleted. Or the original post modified to clearly state what true situation.
No you definitely want to hold @amirm emails in the ' pipe line ' just ask the AP and Klippel folks ..Hey all,
TL;DR - the DMCA take-down notice was sent out by our 3rd party service provider in error and will be retracted as soon as Google processes it. ASR is now whitelisted and this should not happen again.
Long version: I investigated this issue and found out that our service provider (SP) did in fact sent this notice on behalf of Sonarworks. I contacted the SP, and they responded that this should not have happened and is currently investigated. It was possibly a human error, but there's no confirmation yet.
We use the service only to scan for pirated content - torrents, cracks, keygens - because it directly impacts our business.
We do not use the service or any other means to take action against articles, reviews, forum posts, blog posts or any other entries that merely discusses, reviews, critiques or posts information/screenshots/videos of our software.
So this should not have happened, and I apologize on behalf of Sonarworks that this has happened.
Our SP has submitted a retraction to Google regarding this notice. It will be processed by Google within 3-7 business days. There's an additional 10 day legal waiting period - as far as I understand, it can be used for counter-claims. Furthermore, the SP will investigate how this happened and make sure it doesn't repeat in the future.
I hope I have cleared the air on this unfortunate matter. Let me know if there's anything left unanswered!
Also, I sent an apology to Amir regarding the lack of response to the original message addressed to Sonarworks. The message got stuck in the pipe-line, which should never happen. I've raised the issue with my colleagues so we can avoid such issues in the future.
Exactly what worries me. But Amir has modified the thread title so nothing more to complain about.I'm curious in situations like this how many people make it far enough into the thread to see the change in the story.
Not Buyin‘ It (literally)
I don't think that's fair.
It's a relatively obscure piece of software, just as "the power of this public forum" is also dubious in its influence. A bunch of geeks jumping up and down does not an earthquake make.
The response has been timely, contrite and shows considerable investigation has been undertaken to ensure it doesn't happen again.
DMCA takedown services are notoriously overzealous. Sometimes they even flag official websites as infringing. I have no trouble believing this explanation. As for the lost emails, such things happen. They responded with a public apology. That's good enough for me.It was a classy apology, but I’m not really satisfied as to either the kindergarten product concept (IMHO), or their “caught in the pipeline” plus “mistake of a third-party service-provider“ excuse/explanation.
I disagree, but I am glad to see both points of view represented. So thank you.