Rhamnetin
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2023
- Messages
- 219
- Likes
- 452
Then my friend I feel bad you for, when I listen to music i'm enjoying the music, i'm listening to it and not only measure it. When I eat food I don't only look nutritional properties, I just taste it.
Every headphone has it's own colouring and flavor for everyones taste and ear. No instrument does reproduce frequencies are perfect as possible, there no such thing as neutral, Harman is just a idealized frequency response. Most music producers won't even know Harman, it's a niche. Wake up
No need to feel bad, it's quite nice not spending $6,000 on headphones and enjoying the music rather than enjoying the feeling of having blown $6k on a fancy looking product.
If there's no such thing as neutral, what would you call a linear frequency response on loudspeakers?
I’ve been using this site for a couple of years as I dig my frequency responses raw…and I really like the more scientific approach to audio (even if I lean more towards IEF neutral than Harman).
Back when I first bought the Susvara I honestly liked it very much. It was all I listened to for a couple of weeks. A true honeymoon.
I then put back on my trusty HD600 one day and couldn’t believe what I heard. I started doing some quick a/b listening between the two and quickly realised that I had upgraded the bass and subbass qualities of the 600 via the Susvara..but at the expense of the mids and treble. This felt so counter intuitive that I started questioning my senses. Slept on it, did the same experiment the day after and ended up with an even greater appreciation of the 600…and genuinely disappointed with the Hifiman.
This lead me to a/b the Sus with my Sundara and HE500 and curiously enough I ended up prefering both.
Now try explaining this to anyone over say Head-Fi or anyone enamoured with the more…errr…elusive and nonsensical parts of audio. They’ll quickly throw you in the pillory and fetch their rotten tomatoes. Tastes are ok as long as they don’t interfere with flagships and holy cows.
Anyhoo, after reading most of this thread I realised that I’m not alone and that common sense does exist in a few dusty corners of the hobby. Made me smile and consequently sign up.
Thanks for the review Amir, much appreciated.
I've been there as well, having owned and compared really expensive headphones to cheap ones and preferred the cheap ones for sounding more natural. Just a few weeks ago before settling on the DCA E3, I was looking for a new closed back headphone but the AKG K371 kept beating all the other contenders or at least not losing despite costing much less than everything else. Usually the super expensive one has some good attributes but not always (e.g. Audio Technica fancy wooden headphones). I got called crazy, although not insulted to the degree that ASR as a whole gets insulted because I didn't bring science into it to prove the point.
Sennheiser HE-1 with all the tube sound injected into it
And the Sony MDR-R10.
Last edited: