Is that the new Xbox controller?RTR is SO much more techno kool than turntables
Check out this bad-ass sucker!
Is that the new Xbox controller?RTR is SO much more techno kool than turntables
Check out this bad-ass sucker!
For those who like listening to turntables on their main systems, why should I consider putting money into this? Can you help me understand why you like listening to records better than HQ streaming?
I'm curious, but not sure I want to invest several hundred more dollars on an appropriate rig
Because two is better than one?Always wondered, why the two arms?
So you can play two different tracks at once?
My mechanical quartz watch is currently off by about 2 seconds. I set it as near as I could when DST ended in late October. That's an accuracy better than 4 ppm.
It's a piece of jewellery that also tells time. That makes it more useful than a ring or a bracelet.
Or a mono cartridge.Usually a second arm is for 78rpm.
My mechanical quartz watch is currently off by about 2 seconds.
As long as you don't try pulling a Fremmer claiming vinyl is a superior medium for the reproduction of music, your fine.
Used to keep 1 suit around for weddings and funerals. Thank goodness times have changed and that convention is no longer deemed nessacary, we can now dress casually any place and not be inappropriate.
As long as you don't try pulling a Fremmer claiming vinyl is a superior medium for the reproduction of music, your fine. We use science here to measure the quality of reproduction, not "sounds good to me". Vinyl is stuck in the 1950s technically and just can't compete with modern methods of recording and playback.
It's a Tag Heuer with a battery powered quartz movement. By mechanical I meant that it has a traditional face with hands rather than a digital display. The battery lasts 5 years.(Grand) Seiko Spring Drive?
I've an old Seiko quartz watch which I wore everyday for 28 years. It was exactly and precisely 1 second fast every month. So each 6 months when daylight sayings time came and went I'd set it 3 seconds slow and by the next change it was 3 seconds fast. Oh and the batteries lasted 11 years 7 months each time. Should need another one next year. This is a LCD digital display.There is a lot to be said for something that tells the time, doesn't need to be re-charged every night and which you can almost forget about on your risk. And if you are in a meeting or talking to people with no clock clearly visible a discreet glance at your wrist tends to be perceived as being much less rude than constantly looking at a mobile phone if you need to be aware of time.
<snip> I've a newer Citizen solar powered watch. It is nice, light (titanium), but it gains 3 seconds each month. I have to set it slow by 9 seconds. But it presumably doesn't need a battery or a winding ever. This one has a mechanical face. It does look a good deal more stylish.
I just wish the whole thing was easier and more modular. It shouldn't be so hard to replace a cartridge. Good TTs shouldn't be thousands of dollars; perhaps they are not and I need to find a sweet-spot for price to performance.
Good news to hear. Eco-Drive is what mine is. My understanding is they don't have batteries, but something like a small super-capacitor for holding charge.I'm closing in on 2 decades with a Citizen Eco-Drive and except for making sure it gets light everyday (can't store it in a drawer) it hasn't needed anything.
Good news to hear. Eco-Drive is what mine is. My understanding is they don't have batteries, but something like a small super-capacitor for holding charge.
To be fair whilst there is a bit of this here it is nowhere near what you would suffer in the opposite direction on a forum like What’s Best if you type facts!
.
Technics tried to make cartridge replacement/upgrades easier and more modular when they introduced the T4P plug-in style cartridge format (some call it the "p-mount"). First introduced on the early Technics linear tracking models (the SL-7, SL-10, and SL-15), the T4P standard attempted to "standardize" cartridge weight and tracking force so that consumers could easily replaced a cartridge simply by removing a set screw, unplugging the old cartridge, plugging in the new cartridge, and then replacing the set screw. No further adjustments were necessary as long as the replacement cartridge met the T4P standard. Unfortunately, it was introduced just as CDs were coming onto the scene, so it did not catch on industry-wide.
“No further adjustments were necessary”...would have condemned it to audiophile scorn even without CD!Technics tried to make cartridge replacement/upgrades easier and more modular when they introduced the T4P plug-in style cartridge format (some call it the "p-mount"). First introduced on the early Technics linear tracking models (the SL-7, SL-10, and SL-15), the T4P standard attempted to "standardize" cartridge weight and tracking force so that consumers could easily replaced a cartridge simply by removing a set screw, unplugging the old cartridge, plugging in the new cartridge, and then replacing the set screw. No further adjustments were necessary as long as the replacement cartridge met the T4P standard. Unfortunately, it was introduced just as CDs were coming onto the scene, so it did not catch on industry-wide.