Because I don't need them?Why not buy those with your own money, like I do?
Because I don't need them?Why not buy those with your own money, like I do?
The love of a sasquatch is not like the love of a square.I hear it's better than crocodiles.
I returned two DAC and one HPA due to issues I observed.What are you doing with it all?
The images don't seem to work...I just accidentally got this result. Source from REW via Topping 10B to Zen Tour. 48 khz recorded at 96 khz. Signal is 19 and 20 khz at - 60 db. 256 k fft.
This is the same signal with this result only using Audacity to generate and play the tone.
By the way, I wouldn't be surprised if this kind of strange behavior is related to running/having the MQA code on XMOS. Wouldn't be first time...
The plots, probably, but I think the audience wants to know the methods exactly, i.e. as detailed as possible how the data in the plots was retrieved and with which parameters the plot was made. (apologies if you told this already, then I missed it)I think they are self-explanatory for this forum's audience?
Looks clean that way.Then have REQ make a PCM file of the test signal, and FFT that directly. That should show if the problem is with generation.
Let me fix this. I posted in the wrong thread and moved them. Somehow lost the image.The images don't seem to work...
Mkay, so it could then still be the way REW plays it. I don't know if the Java subsystem has any particular issues with this. It has been a very, very long while since I've had a look at that. Back then I didn't know I might careLooks clean that way.
Again, your findings are unlikely to result in audible issues with that DAC. Would you agree with that?
So, I'm still not certain what statement(s) you are trying to make:
- the ASR measurement of that device failed to capture that behavior? And...?
Help me out here, please.
(1) I thought I did!(1)Can you elaborate as to which ones those are? Possibly you have better luck deciphering Google Translate gibberish? It's really not the right tool to use for a complex conversation.
(2)Indeed, please don't touch the fonts, especially the colour. Black text with dark themes on the forum does not work together.
The last time I tried to use REW to capture freq response via mic, it wasn't working. I wonder all those Windows updates caused any issue with REW. I am thinking to remove my version and install whatever latest one soon.I just accidentally got this result. Source from REW via Topping 10B to Zen Tour. 48 khz recorded at 96 khz. Signal is 19 and 20 khz at - 60 db. 256 k fft.
View attachment 180575
This is the same signal with this result only using Audacity to generate and play the tone.
View attachment 180573
I must have still missed it then.(1) I thought I did!
I just accidentally got this result. Source from REW via Topping 10B to Zen Tour. 48 khz recorded at 96 khz. Signal is 19 and 20 khz at - 60 db. 256 k fft.
View attachment 180575
This is the same signal with this result only using Audacity to generate and play the tone.
View attachment 180573
The REW generating the signal is on a MacBook Pro. I am a version or two behind current.The last time I tried to use REW to capture freq response via mic, it wasn't working. I wonder all those Windows updates caused any issue with REW. I am thinking to remove my version and install whatever latest one soon.
Yes positive. The noise floor goes up 7 or 8 db vs 24 bit, but if I use higher rates that is all it is clean otherwise.Are you sure the first one wasn't generated/processed as 16 bits and the second one, as 24?
Beats me. Different drivers in REW and Audacity?Yes positive. The noise floor goes up 7 or 8 db vs 24 bit, but if I use higher rates that is all it is clean otherwise.
I'm not sure how to answer that on a Mac. I may try it in the other direction as there is an ASIO driver for the D10B.Beats me. Different drivers in REW and Audacity?