Pretty sure I am not. Did put THD or SINAD near ~every number. In any case, just tell me if you find a mistake and I'll fix.IIRC, the posted number was 85-90dB, not 70dB.
Don't confuse SINAD with the distance to the Harmonics. SINAD is the sum of noise and the harmonics.
And yes you did quote ~85dB which is of course way 'safer' than 70 or so. There were many others quoting all sorts of D numbers in this thread. And on ASR-at-large you'll find figures like 70 & 75dB SINAD quite often. Particularly on AVR threads were fanboys will tell you all day long how their devices are "not audible" in spite of all the shameful measurement results and that no one 'needs' better than their amazing AVR.
my opinion on all that is still that any generic "distortion at xx dB is ok" is a lot more misleading than useful/practical. A giant lot more.That basically satisfies the "lenient limit" for THD as established in this thread:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-thresholds-of-amp-and-dac-measurements.5734/
So yes: highest harmonic @ -85dB should not be much of an issue in real program material. It might be audible in freak accident scenarios and with test tones, thus -115dB is the strict limit of audibility.
Archimago comes to a similar conclusion when thinking about why the sample with 0.2% added THD was preferred.
cool, let's talk AVRs, I'll need "a minute" thoughAccording to the Senpai's measurements, the highest harmonic of e.g.: the X4700 sits at -85dB and is the 3rd order. The second order sits at -103(?) dB.
Last edited: