Digital is better at everything.
Absolutely. Digital crossovers beat analogue by a long way.Even if you filter in the audible band, for example low-passing a mid-woofer at 2kHz?
Even if you filter in the audible band, for example low-passing a mid-woofer at 2kHz?
Absolutely. Digital crossovers beat analogue by a long way.
Including AD-DA?Absolutely. Digital crossovers beat analogue by a long way.
Any analogue filter can be replicated digitally. The converse is not true.Can they be made leak-proof and phase accurate?
Can they be made leak-proof and phase accurate?
*Can* cause.
Quality latex, no pinholes, proper fit.What does "leak-proof" mean?
Not as much as analogue.
If you don't have a problem, fuck about until you do.
What does "leak-proof" mean? As to phase accurate, the answer is yes, if that is what you target (unlike with analog, where you can't).
What does "leak-proof" mean? As to phase accurate, the answer is yes, if that is what you target (unlike with analog, where you can't).
Or...if you can't hear hear it because you haven't trained your fucking brainears to recognise it you'll never have a problem
...except smeared sound.
Does. Each band phases and delays. Higher db gain bigger the effect i find
Digital is better at everything.
Would a mid-woofer low-pass still require a low pass analog filter?
Except pressuring muso's to nail the take...and that warm natural compression you get when recording to 2 inch tape
Remember this is Audio Science Review, not Audio Subjectivist Beliefs.
Do you mean reconstruction filter? It is an essential part of the DAC process. Of course the woofer itself acts as a low-pass filter.