• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping D50 III optical input bug with 44.1kHz files

Do you notice audible drop-outs using the Topping D50 III optical input with 44.1kHz files?

  • Yes. I can hear drop-outs with the optical input (44.1kHz files)

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • No. I do not hear audible drop-outs with the optical input (44.1=kHz files)

    Votes: 4 23.5%
  • I own a Topping D50 III but have not used the optical input yet

    Votes: 4 23.5%
  • I do not own a Topping D50 III

    Votes: 6 35.3%

  • Total voters
    17
Posting an update as I seem to have possibly solved this issue by trying my other Chromecast Audio (I have two) with the D50 III. So far no drop outs with 44.1 kHz music. So it seems to be a problem with my original Chromecast Audio, but only with this DAC. Very strange that it's only with 44.1kHz music though.
 
Posting an update as I seem to have possibly solved this issue by trying my other Chromecast Audio (I have two) with the D50 III. So far no drop outs with 44.1 kHz music. So it seems to be a problem with my original Chromecast Audio, but only with this DAC. Very strange that it's only with 44.1kHz music though.
Strange! Perhaps it's a poorly performing clock that's too marginal at 44kHz for the DAC to reliably extract a good clock feed.
 
Strange! Perhaps it's a poorly performing clock that's too marginal at 44kHz for the DAC to reliably extract a good clock feed.
I'm gonna bet it has a crystal at a multiple of 48kHz, and is trying to derive the 44.1 imperfectly from that. Whereas all the other most used sample rates (48, 96 etc can be derived perfectly.
 
I'm gonna bet it has a crystal at a multiple of 48kHz, and is trying to derive the 44.1 imperfectly from that. Whereas all the other most used sample rates (48, 96 etc can be derived perfectly.
88.2 kHz was fine, though
 
OK at multiplying, poor at dividing? Sounds like a school report :D
 
Back
Top Bottom