I'm curious why you don't respond to any of the points that Amir has made regarding the paper and blog post. He even helpfully bolded some statements / clarifications / conclusions. Since you cited the paper / blog post, do you agree with his analysis? Or you disagree?
Like I said above I'll give more weight on scientific papers and scientist. As I know Amir is not a scientist, he's not creating science and he claimed that he's less biaised because he's trained and his experience.
About science the way to debate or argues about studies is to produce science and more studies, personnal opinion are no help.
I proposed an exchange with a scientist, the one who worked on what I shared. I'm sure he's more apt than me to anwser arguments about it.
And finaly I created this thread to have other peoples input. My goal were and are not to start a debate between me and Amir. Sure I'm no expert in the audio field but I can be good at critical thinking. And warning flags are pretty easy to spot. Now I appreciate all the work that have been done so far, I don't fully understand why basic advices like : listen before look at measurments create that much of heated discussion.