OK, going to make a start on relating my experience.
Firstly I have been acoustically measuring rooms for many years. About 15 years ago I bought my TagMcLaren AV system which was one of the first to implement a room EQ system. That pretty much cured my serial upgrading habit because the penny dropped and I realised the room was the important bit and changing the CD player for the Nth time really was going to make very little difference. John Malcahy who was the technical director at TAG is the author of REW.
Although I am used to measuring rooms, I have never actually had the opportunity to implement passive treatments before now, its was just never domestically acceptable. However now we have built our new house I had the opportunity to build a dedicated theatre and listening room. So this was a bit of a learning curve.
The room is 6m x 4.5m x 2.8m, brick walls, concrete floor and has a 133" Screen Inovations curved Black Diamond cinemascope screen and Epson LS10000 with Prismasonic anamorphic lens.
Here are the pre treatment measurements, room EQ off. Room EQ Wizard and MiniDSP Umik usb mic.
Needless to say the room in this form sounded bad. Boomy and confusing. Flutter echo etc. Just for a sense of the sound, here is a clip of a hand clap.
http://gofile.me/2vnEF/71xdznPvD
I do a lot of headphone listening and prefer a "drier"sound. I dont want to hear the reverb of the room and is the biggest issue in the room as far as I am concerned. Not sure I understand some of the advice you see saying a music listening room should have higher reverb times than a theatre room. As such I was aiming for a reverb time of about 0.3 seconds..
Regarding the lower frequency modes it seemed unlikely that passive treatments would be able to address them, being excessive in size, so I will use DEQ to deal with those (Audyssey in my current amp).
As mentioned I have no previous experience of implementing passive treatments, so apart from reading on the various forums, it was difficult to decide precisely the quantity and composition of the types of treatment required - absorption, diffusion and bass traps. So I ended up concentrating on the vicoustic range of products.
http://www.vicoustic.com/hifi-home-cinema/products/acoustic-treatment/absorption
Looking at the data I went for the following panels:
Cinema Rounds -
http://www.vicoustic.com/hifi-home-cinema/products/acoustic-treatment/absorption/panel/327
Super Bass Extreme membrane corner traps -http://
www.vicoustic.com/images/pdfs/panels/technical_files/Super-Bass-Extreme-Nordik.pdf
Flexiwood A50 Diffuser/Absorber -
http://www.vicoustic.com/images/pdfs/panels/technical_files/Flexi-Wood-A50-Nordik.pdf
Multifuser DC2 Diffusers -
http://www.vicoustic.com/hifi-home-cinema/products/acoustic-treatment/diffusion/panel/308
A big pile of boxes and mild intoxication due to glue fumes.
I performed the installation in phases so I could measure and listen to the effect. Corner traps first. This is where I realised my first mistake - where I had installed the power sockets meant the traps could only go down to a certain level, limiting the number to 3 on the front wall and 2 on the rear wall (also due to window).
Measurements after traps installed
That seemed to work, not enough though. So essentially following the Vicoustic recommendations I continue to add panels including an additional 2 corner traps at the rear of the room.
http://www.vicoustic.com/hifi-home-cinema/tools/acoustic-simulator/acoustic_mb/40
Long story short ended up like this.
Low frequency reverb times could still reduce. How does it sound? Clean, tight, detailed and nuetral with excellent wide sound stage. It doesnt sound over damped or dull. In fact the Audyssey curve needs to be dialled down a little at HF, which I can do as I have the pro kit.