Auto EQ will not attempt to boost that dip in 63Hz. It will only use it (if it can) to correct for the steep cuts it will need for the peaks.I thought, it didn't work to boost the room modes with the EQ?
Or did I get something wrong?
Auto EQ will not attempt to boost that dip in 63Hz. It will only use it (if it can) to correct for the steep cuts it will need for the peaks.I thought, it didn't work to boost the room modes with the EQ?
Or did I get something wrong?
Depends on the size and reflectivity of you rroom really. FDW 15 is a good starting point. It will not effect the LF much.how can I determine where and in what size an FWD would be most effective in my case?
Something is completely wonky.This is What Audyssey wants to do out - the distances, gain, and crossovers go completely wonky.
Flipped the L and R - same result with the R channel (amp thinks it is L) falling off. I dont think it is an AVR issue, thinking speaker / tweet blown.Something is completely wonky.
Audyssey would never correct to curves like that unless something in your AVR is amiss or something
in your calibration setup-adjustments is not being done properly. Review your procedures.
If you have one, yes. When entered into the REW data base it corrects for inaccuracy's of the microphone.Is the use of a calibration file,
from my microphone (OMNITRONIC mm2usb) actually recommended or necessary?
So while we're on this, does it matter whether you use the 0 degree or 90 degree mic method so long as you use the appropriate calibration file? I'm using a UMIK-1 and have always used 0 degrees for my 2.0/2.1 system, having assumed that the 90 degrees method was for multichannel with height speakers etc. I see more and more people using the 90 degree method on youtube even for 2 channel systems. Thanks.If you have one, yes. When entered into the REW data base it corrects for inaccuracy's of the microphone.
I'm not an expert here but my understanding is if your doing individual speaker measurements and you have the mic pointed directly at the speaker, you use 0. If your doing in-room measurements such as Audyssey/Dirac calibrations, etc, with the mic pointed up, the 90 is correct.So while we're on this, does it matter whether you use the 0 degree or 90 degree mic method so long as you use the appropriate calibration file? I'm using a UMIK-1 and have always used 0 degrees for my 2.0/2.1 system, having assumed that the 90 degrees method was for multichannel with height speakers etc. I see more and more people using the 90 degree method on youtube even for 2 channel systems. Thanks.
Many thanks, but it’s a broken linkThere are 11 pages of content, I think this is Part 3.
Many thanks, but it’s a broken link
See it! GreatMany thanks, but it’s a broken link
You should be able to get out to long lengths using a powered USB hub in the middle, or an active cable.Cable would probably need to be 50ft or longer.
I've no idea how you figure to go from USB to HDMI and back again?I figure trying to use a really long hdmi cable is better than trying to use a long mic cable.