The goal is that with 96khz i found the sound more real-life like and open, less strainier, at high volumes and i feel more immersed vs the 48, maybe my 20 year Age contribute but doesn't matter (Maybe i have very good hearing, NEVER MIND..), to me is better, don't care what the other's people say, that doesn't change a thing for me, if they say it's all BS etc etc. even because in this site they said me several things such as: Crosstalk of 60db or 90db doesn't make a difference [I got pha-3 that's 60db and Topping d50+atom 90 db overall, the difference is audible there on separation] balanced connection are bullshit, cables don't make any difference (Even tho i stated that with my qed toslink vs a 10€ toslink optical the difference was audible, telling that wasn't a 'mind thing', under their ''law of psicologic bla bla..'', it sounded way better on treble to me, for sure. And now i'm sure because i can tell that i got two cheap RCA cables form different companies, one long 0,2metres and the other 0,5m, they sounded different, seriously, the 0,2 one had more body, or bass, overall fuller to me with my setup, so, to me is totally bullshit who state that cables don't do any difference..) and other kind of stuff.. Anyway..
So for you the endgame point of discussion was that with upsampling of frequencies you couldn't restore frequencies that wasn't on recording, oh that's true, you can't add something isn't present on original recording, but what if that's original.. No wait, let me explain a thing, i don't know how sound is going to be compressed into frequencies on recording, that's why what i will say probably would be a guessing.. What if original recording contains all the real-life world existing frequencies, but if you choose '44khz recording' all the frequencies will be compressed into 44khz, that could be the explanation itself..
Anyway again, if you say that with upsampling upper frequencies can't exist, i don't beleive it because first of all that i think can be surely be measures with frequency graphs and that kind of stuff, and second, the upsampling would not exist, for me. I think that on 48khz to 96khz even the 30-40khz sinewaves gets some db of paying into graphs, so, if that's so, that's why the upsampling exist, so the only thing is to know where those 30-40khz sinewaves where comes from? And mostly why they Fall linear with the rest of the sound? Maybe because it's part of the sound itself and restored by upsampled isn't it? Anyway, i'm not into audio measurement at all, so i'm just 'supposing', but i think that some of my statement got a base, if someone can understand that could be explained more deeply by who are into this job, for sure.. And all of that 'magical' ultrasonic frequencies can't be heard or not by our medium 20hz-20khz ears capabilities, is another pair of thing, someone state those can be 'felt', anyway, for sure in our world there are like 1000khz frequencies and more, as it is real that here in Italy i can see the Rome while i can't watch at the same time Paris in France LOL
Hope to be understanded, sorry if i didn't explained well, English is not my main languange
Anyway, in which way the eyes are different than ears on ''480p on 4k upsampling looks better''
'' Yes, it will, because your eyes work completely different than your ears!''.?
OMSHIT i swear i thinked just at the end i had lost all my text but thanks god i reloaded the page and it was there, fiu...