• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required as is 20 years of participation in forums (not all true). Come here to have fun, be ready to be teased and not take online life too seriously. We now measure and review equipment for free! Click here for details.

Review and Measurements of Cambridge DacMagic Plus

folzag

Member
Patreon Donor
Joined
Jul 24, 2018
Messages
53
Likes
58
#81
I own two of these; one in black and one in silver. This test is proof to me that measurements only go so far. While the M51 test showed far more 'anomolies' than this [tho, with notably higher SINAD at least], I can strongly affirm that when source is a cable box to> 50 foot hi speed HDMI to> M51, it far out resolves the same cable box to> short TOSLINK to> DacMagic+ to> 50 foot Mogami cables to the same amp & headphones as previous. ;)
Could be the cable box. Seems probable cable box design would pay close engineering attention HDMI path, and TOSLINK could be an after-thought.
 

pma

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
12
Likes
28
#82
Here is Toslink comparison to USB:


Performance is tiny bit worse with Toslink. Noise floor is a bit higher, there are a couple of tones on each side of our main signal at 12 khz. And some power supply spikes down low:

View attachment 22437

Nothing audible so use whichever is needed/convenient.
I assume those power spectral lines, though very low in level, might be a result of different cable shield leak currents when you changed from USB to Toslink. I have got rid of them completely by using an isolation transformer in front of the DacMagic Plus power supply.
 

pma

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
12
Likes
28
#83
I think back in 2011, there was not as much awareness of output impedance. Or the serious headphone audiophile community that exists today. So people did what they used to do which is to put a resistor on the output and with it, gain output protection, ease of design, etc.
I do not agree with this. I was using output impedance of <= 5ohm in my preamp headphone outputs, class A biased, and able to give more than 250mA output current, back in 2002. Still not usual, today.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
28
Likes
23
Location
Leeds, UK
#84
EDIT: Added jitter graph.

Hi all, new member here - I have been following the forum for a few weeks now.

This review was of particular interest to me, as I have an older Dacmagic (Azur) the model that preceded the one under test here.

I have performed some measurements myself - however I don't have access to an AP (lucky you Amir!!) - I use Virtins and an Asus STX sound card.

The figures I get for my DacMagic:

THD: 0.0009% (L) 0.0007% (R)
THD+N: 0.0011% (L) 0.0010% (R)
SINAD: 98.82dB (L) 99.98dB (R)
SNR: 102.72dB (L) 102.76dB (R)

I have posted the graph from Virtins and also RMAA test results (should be attached to this post).

I sometimes question the numbers produced by RMAA.

My test procedure (Virtins) is: Input levels are -6dB - through to a home build sound card buffer (a simple box, 100k Input impedance, 2x gain) -> Asus STX.

Test frequency is: 1.000428 kHz

For RMAA, I use -1dB levels, rest of the signal path is the same.

All tests conducted at 48kHz / 24bit, using SPDIF into the DAC.

I suspect the noise levels could be better (Asus quote 124dB for the card) however I guess the noise from the PC is inevitable.

Jitter was measured with the Jitter function in Arta - 48kHz / FFT: 32768 / Kaiser7 / Linear averaging.

There was no difference between Optical and SPDIF. I am using a USB to SPDIF converter (CM6631A chipset) from a Chinese Vendor on Ebay (£32 or 32 GBP) - I guess that helps.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Jimster480

Major Contributor
Patreon Donor
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
1,063
Likes
563
Location
Miami
#85
Well for something that is 10 years old.... it looks like it performs pretty well!
Better than many other devices which cost way more and are newer.
Sometimes "newer" isn't always better.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2018
Messages
32
Likes
30
#86
is there actually a difference when using a balanced out but using an xlr to rca to feed a unbalanced amp ? Some people at other forum claims to hear improvements as the rca out has to go through 1 extra op amp
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
28
Likes
23
Location
Leeds, UK
#87
I've read that people who own the Azur DAC claim that taking an unbalanced feed from the balanced output claim it sounds better, but I don't believe it myself.
I challenge anybody to hear the difference a single opamp (or even multiple opamps for that matter) inserted into a circuit would make, assuming the circuit design is competent of course.
After all, the music we listen to will have passed through several opamps (usually standard NE5532s) during the course of mixing / mastering.
An NE5532 configured for a gain of x2 will yield THD less than 0.0001% and s/n ratio of -110dB + so quite how someone would hear any difference...
 

JJB70

Major Contributor
Patreon Donor
Joined
Aug 17, 2018
Messages
1,304
Likes
2,340
Location
Milton Keynes, England
#89
Should i upgrade mine to a tier 1/2 Topping or SMSL DAC to enjoy better sound then?
Only if you want to buy something newer. In terms of sound quality the DAC Magic+ is audibly transparent and remains pretty well featured and I see no reason to replace one if it still works.
 

Sueekhy

New Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
4
Likes
0
#90
Only if you want to buy something newer. In terms of sound quality the DAC Magic+ is audibly transparent and remains pretty well featured and I see no reason to replace one if it still works.
Thanks JJ, I'm always tempted by the lure of DSD native though....
 

Veri

Major Contributor
Patreon Donor
Joined
Feb 6, 2018
Messages
2,053
Likes
1,857
#92
For anyone wondering how the jitter is so squeaky clean on this older device. They used advanced (ESS Sabre-like) ASRC to get it so. Found the details here (dutch article): https://www.hifi.nl/recensie/3628/Cambridge-Audio-DacMagic.html

Each channel of the DacMagic has its own Wolfson WM8740 DAC and analog circuits that are dual mono and balanced. The DacMagic therefore also has XLR outputs in addition to cinch/rca. Thanks to a unique digital filter circuit with DSP (Digital Signal Processing), extra Jitter suppression and upsampling to a higher sample rate became possible. The DSP IC is a Texas Instruments 32-bit type that works with ATF (Adaptive Time Filtering) asynchronous upsampling. That ATF is in fact one of the most important assets of the DacMagic because the resampling process has a higher precision than that of most common sample-rate converters. The Cambridge DacMagic ATF DSP works with an algorithm that is closer to the original signal than conventional interpolators and can upsample up to 192 kilo Hertz (24-bit), according to the manufacturer.

Thanks to the 32-bit DSP IC, Cambridge Audio has been able to develop their own digital filter algorithms with three different filter options. With a button on the front panel you can choose between linear phase, minimum phase and steep filtering.
 
Joined
Apr 23, 2019
Messages
29
Likes
8
#93
Has anyone tried to feed this DAC from a Sony DAP (I have a NW-ZX300) via the OTG cable?

I was going to buy a used one but a guy on Head-Fi said that this DAC would not pick up a flow from the OTG cable on different Sony DAP's. He has the two models above mine.

Help?

Thanks.

Shane D
 
Top Bottom