That was back when each new generation was putting out music that was different from what went before. That model broke down some years ago now.But yoots are supposed to rebel against the older generation.
That was back when each new generation was putting out music that was different from what went before. That model broke down some years ago now.But yoots are supposed to rebel against the older generation.
And just look at how annoyed some of them are by current music. XDBut yoots are supposed to rebel against the older generation.
For some reason I don't think this was cute. I'm seeing a lot of people acting on hate and not just the musical kind.Oh No, is it disco zombies come back to life?
I thought we put a permanent end to that garbage back on July 12th, 1979
We offered the disco ducks a 0.10 cent beer night to bring all their disco LP's
to Cominsky Park so we could blow them up.
A real piece of musical history now. LOL
Wikipedia: Disco Demolitoin NightRolling Stone critic Dave Marsh described Disco Demolition Night as "your most paranoid fantasy about where the ethnic cleansing of the rock radio could ultimately lead". Marsh was one who, at the time, deemed the event an expression of bigotry, writing in a year-end 1979 feature that "white males, eighteen to thirty-four are the most likely to see disco as the product of homosexuals, blacks, and Latins, and therefore they're the most likely to respond to appeals to wipe out such threats to their security. It goes almost without saying that such appeals are racist and sexist, but broadcasting has never been an especially civil-libertarian medium."
Nile Rodgers, producer and guitarist for the disco-era band Chic, likened the event to Nazi book burning. Gloria Gaynor, who had a huge disco hit with "I Will Survive", stated, "I've always believed it was an economic decision—an idea created by someone whose economic bottom line was being adversely affected by the popularity of disco music. So they got a mob mentality going." Harry Wayne Casey, singer for the disco act KC and the Sunshine Band, did not believe Disco Demolition Night was discriminatory and felt that Dahl was simply an "idiot".
University of East London professor Tim Lawrence wrote that the event was the culmination of the overproduction of disco, the investment by major record companies in music their heterosexual white executives did not like, and the "disco sucks" campaign, which he argued was homophobic, sexist and racist. Dahl denies that prejudice was his motivation for the event: "The worst thing is people calling Disco Demolition homophobic or racist. It just wasn't ... We weren't thinking like that." In a 2014 op-ed for Crain's Chicago Business, Dahl defended the event as "a romp, not of major cultural significance". He wrote that it had been "reframed" as prejudiced by a 1996 VH1 documentary about the 1970s, in a move he described as "a cheap shot made without exploration".
There is very little Rock that that allows for anything else than headbanging or jumping in a moshpit.
Or how I define dancing. I have done theatre and have taken several types of dance classes over the years but I wouldn't exactly try to dance tango or shake my hips at Speed Metal.I think that depends on how you define Rock. I love (LOVE!) melodic Thrash and Speed Metal, but I also love the kind of Rock that's designed for sitting in a bean bag being stoned out of your mind (not that I actually do that).
I was there. Was the wifes first ballgame and she asked if that happened at every double header. No dear.Oh No, is it disco zombies come back to life?
I thought we put a permanent end to that garbage back on July 12th, 1979
We offered the disco ducks a 0.10 cent beer night to bring all their disco LP's
to Cominsky Park so we could blow them up.
A real piece of musical history now. LOL
Or how I define dancing.
Kind of makes it hard to ever organize a Disco Demolition equivalent for Rock.
They all sound like way too much of a good time.
- Eradicate Rock night?
- Ravage Rock?
- Stamp Out Rock?
- Ruin Rock?
- Maim Metal?
- Extirpate Rock Evening?
still?
We're also at the tail end of some music genres where even mashing two or three together has been done.
Somehow it got me thinking of the 1981 movie Outland. One ambitious part of the movie that I enjoy is the background music they made for the club scene. It's obviously designed to be as futuristic for the time as possible without being comical, and I personally think they pretty much nailed it. It's of course still outdated today, but it's one of many things that makes me believe in a sort of predictability in how the progress of music slosh around as waves.
And just look at how annoyed some of them are by current music. XD
Someone recently pointed out Hyperpop/Glitchcore to me. Like an over the top version of pop, rap and synths mixed together. Not entirely my style, but at least you can dance to it.
It's all an illusion: we swim in in a sea of memories and half remembered tunes. And tunes attach themselves to times, or at the very least, the transient taste of a given time that helps to identify and describe that time. And if one thinks older music is better than newer music there are two things going on. First, one has heard so much more old music many more times simply because one gets older. Note that one has the option of jumping into any of these different musical streams they want to, but they are much more likely to hew to known paths because that's human nature for the most part. The second being that those who don't follow the musical paths of others, those who made clear breaks with the past, tend to keep right on going in the same weird direction for the rest of their lives, Elliott Carter being one of the best examples.Aphex Twin released the crossover hit Windowlicker in 1999 and he'd been putting out tracks for over a decade before that. I'm pretty sure by now it's been sampled in car commercials.
I think to the degree "old music is killing new" it's that, if you know the old, the new is a heck of a lot less experimental and daring than it makes itself out to be.
Aphex Twin released the crossover hit Windowlicker in 1999 and he'd been putting out tracks for over a decade before that. I'm pretty sure by now it's been sampled in car commercials.
I think to the degree "old music is killing new" it's that, if you know the old, the new is a heck of a lot less experimental and daring than it makes itself out to be.
There's a story in an ancient play about birds called The Birds
And it's a short story from before the world began
From a time when there was no earth, no land.
Only air and birds everywhere. ...
And one of these birds was a lark and one day her father died. ...
She decided to bury her father in the back of her own head.
And this was the beginning of memory.
Because before this no one could remember a thing.
They were just constantly flying in circles.
Aphex Twin released the crossover hit Windowlicker in 1999 and he'd been putting out tracks for over a decade before that.
It's all an illusion: we swim in in a sea of memories and half remembered tunes.
The real question is why? Did talent disappear, I don't think so. Part of the answer is in my last post, music business dosn't spend the money it use to to find and develop new artists. And they want instant success, where many of these great old bands took 2 or 3 albums to get a hit but the labels kept supporting them anyway. Today many of them would dissapear after there first album and no one would know them.
But yoots are supposed to rebel against the older generation.