• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required as is 20 years of participation in forums (not all true). Come here to have fun, be ready to be teased and not take online life too seriously. We now measure and review equipment for free! Click here for details.

Geshelli archel2/.5 pro owners club

mkawa

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2019
Messages
363
Likes
314
#1
In the review thread for the archell2, it was pointed out that there is no thread for the archel2.5 or differences between the 2 and 2.5, so here we go!
I only have a 2.5, not a 2, but from the review notes and cursory visual inspection, the major differences seem to be:

-balanced input (this almost certainly goes into a bal->se converter before the gain stage, as the gain stage is unlikely to take balanced input.
-opa1656 replaces opa1652 in the gain stage
-internal +/-15v power rails are generated by 2x cui pdm2-s12-s15-s instead of single pcn2-s12-d15-s

I was not planning on tearing mine down, but there have been requests for pcb shots of both the 2.5 and 2 if anyone is interested.

i am extremely impressed with this little box. It’s an incredibly impressive circuit that pushes its inexpensive components to their limits.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
23
Likes
16
#2
I got mine today. It didn't take but a few seconds to hear that I was hearing my Linn KD/3 and not the amp. This was because I had a few tracks selected that I would play through my Chord DAVE using my new HE1000se cans. I did this for a few days leading up to getting the Archell2.5.

Then when it arrived, I listened to the tracks through the Dave again, and then through the Linn with the Archell2.5 at unity gain, the Linn functioning as the pre-amp.

Yeah, give or take, the Linn + Archell2.5 sounded just as good or better than the DAVE alone.

Or, to put it another way, I know that audiophile psychology might dictate what I'm hearing with the new amp in. There could be a lot of factors. Still, after hearing the Linn + Archell2.5 combo, I have no qualms about selling my DAVE as a superfluous piece of gear. In fact, I found the Linn + Archell2.5 to be more revealing, inasmuch as the Dave seems to round notes off, while the Linn + Archell2.5 doesn't apologize for letting the listener hear the warts and all in a recording. Indeed, some of things I was hearing with the Archell2.5 was a little disconcerting that now I was hearing artifacts from needledrops that I had never heard before. That said, I got no impression of accentuated highs, which is largely due to nature of the cans, as well, yet all of the micro detail was there.

The Archell2.5 has plenty of juice to drive the HE1000se.

I know this isn't much of a review, but this little $179 investment probably has made me about $5k that I can put in my pocket by selling the DAVE.

If Geshelli one day made an amp for speakers I know where I would run to next. I'm never in a hurry to upgrade anything, so it's a relaxing feeling that I'm in a great place for both speakers and cans.
 

Blur

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 4, 2019
Messages
198
Likes
140
Location
CA
#3
Just ordered the 2.5 Pro. Going to sell my SP200 if I like it. I don't really care for the volume pot and gain choices on the SP200.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2020
Messages
1
Likes
2
#4
I got 2.5 two days ago (black with smoke glass). The heft and general feel is sturdier than the archel pro original. I mainly got it to upgrade to balanced input since I had the enog 2 pro already and I like to support geshelli since their amps are super underrated. This thing measures better than a THX so I don't really see why anyone would need more. Super competitive, made in US, and a small business. Sounds great on my Ether CX (big planar) and DT 1990s (250ohm) with a ridiculous amount of headroom on both. I like the ethers with enog turned to high gain. Seems to sound a tad better in the bass but it's always tough to tell with stuff like that since I can't a/b it at this point.
 

Blur

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 4, 2019
Messages
198
Likes
140
Location
CA
#6
Can anyone confirm:

In low gain and using an IEM if you move the volume nob back and forth between full and zero is there any hum or crackling?
 

mkawa

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2019
Messages
363
Likes
314
#7
no crackling and no audible hum for me. the sound of the blood vessels in my middle ear dominates any noise :)

this is with both sony ex800st and er4sr
 

Blur

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 4, 2019
Messages
198
Likes
140
Location
CA
#11
Less power, no hiss, much less scratchy volume knob, cool lights, feels a little cheaper as the enclosure of the Geshelli is very homemade vs the industrial design of the SP200.

If all you want is sheer power the SP200 is the way to go. Otherwise the Geshelli is better for lower power needs.

I sold my SP200 if that helps at all. Kept the Geshelli.
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
5
Likes
3
#12
I got mine today. It didn't take but a few seconds to hear that I was hearing my Linn KD/3 and not the amp. This was because I had a few tracks selected that I would play through my Chord DAVE using my new HE1000se cans. I did this for a few days leading up to getting the Archell2.5.

Then when it arrived, I listened to the tracks through the Dave again, and then through the Linn with the Archell2.5 at unity gain, the Linn functioning as the pre-amp.

Yeah, give or take, the Linn + Archell2.5 sounded just as good or better than the DAVE alone.

Or, to put it another way, I know that audiophile psychology might dictate what I'm hearing with the new amp in. There could be a lot of factors. Still, after hearing the Linn + Archell2.5 combo, I have no qualms about selling my DAVE as a superfluous piece of gear. In fact, I found the Linn + Archell2.5 to be more revealing, inasmuch as the Dave seems to round notes off, while the Linn + Archell2.5 doesn't apologize for letting the listener hear the warts and all in a recording. Indeed, some of things I was hearing with the Archell2.5 was a little disconcerting that now I was hearing artifacts from needledrops that I had never heard before. That said, I got no impression of accentuated highs, which is largely due to nature of the cans, as well, yet all of the micro detail was there.

The Archell2.5 has plenty of juice to drive the HE1000se.

I know this isn't much of a review, but this little $179 investment probably has made me about $5k that I can put in my pocket by selling the DAVE.

If Geshelli one day made an amp for speakers I know where I would run to next. I'm never in a hurry to upgrade anything, so it's a relaxing feeling that I'm in a great place for both speakers and cans.

Before selling the DAVE let Amir do a measurement and review!!
 
Top Bottom