WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions.
Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
Yes, one less volume control to contend with and maybe a better signal path (totally dependent on the implementation of the volume control)
I find it a hassle to have a DAC/headphone AMP with a pre-out (But that is what I have at the moment)
I am all in favour of using a DAC with volume control instead of a pre amplifier. In my book for all intents and purposes such a DAC is a pre amplifier, provided you have given up all analogue sources.
Thanks folks. I almost want to buy the Sbaj D5. If the double process from a dac preamp to external preamp may create measureable repeatable data relevant to SQ that would be worth knowing. My speakers, preamp, amp were bought before computer audio ruled. I'm a speaker only guy
(old); really have no use for head phone amp, xlr outs, all in one dac/pre; what has me interested is a <$500 well implemented ess9038pro dac. If
it comes with a side of fries such is life. It might even entice me to try some new tricks that score well on Amirm's graphs
A pre amp is useful if you have multiple analogue inputs, but what are they these days? Internet radio is at least as good as FM, the better disc players have digital outputs and so do televisions. Realistically we are only talking about a turntable. For that I bought a Pro-ject Optical E box, a MM preamp with optical output.