• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Corner Trap Nonsense

Hi

Thanks @Keith_W for starting this thread.. I was about to acquire some doodads similar to those in the video ...
Saved me a bunch...
We, also, fall for these snake oil products ...

Thanks again

Peace.
 
As usual ASR provides some useful and not-so-useful responses :)

Not useful responses: attacking the guy or his company. Just because he is wrong about some things does not mean he is wrong about others. What I am interested in is whether this particular claim is incorrect.

Useful responses: pointing out that velocity absorbers in corners do not work, you need pressure absorbers. However, pressure absorbers like panel traps and Helmholtz resonators are narrowband absorbers and must be tuned to specific problem frequencies.

However, what has not yet been discussed is whether a panel trap works better on the wall or in the corner. Is there a comparison between the effectiveness of the two, in terms of attenuation and size? i.e. can you get away with a smaller panel trap if it is placed in the corner?

I guess that's the gist of it?
 
Keith_W said:
However, what has not yet been discussed is whether a panel trap works better on the wall or in the corner. Is there a comparison between the effectiveness of the two, in terms of attenuation and size? i.e. can you get away with a smaller panel trap if it is placed in the corner?
Click to expand...

You put it against all wall boundaries -- if at all possible -- does not matter a whole lot whether it works "better" if placed at the corners *only or along walls *only. *At least that's what I remember Ron Sauro's remark was when asked about it from John Brandt's youtube channel.

 
Last edited:
Keith_W said:
However, what has not yet been discussed is whether a panel trap works better on the wall or in the corner.
Click to expand...

Yes. It will be one or the other. Probably not the answer you want.

Keith_W said:
Is there a comparison between the effectiveness of the two, in terms of attenuation and size? i.e. can you get away with a smaller panel trap if it is placed in the corner?
Click to expand...

It’s too complicated to predict. Unfortunately trial and error is the final arbiter.

What I can say with confidence is don’t skimp on the quality of the trap based on the idea that positioning will give you better results. Size is only part of the formula for pressure traps.

Get traps that target the trouble frequencies, offer the best objective absorption and experiment with placement until you get the best results
 
Keith_W said:
Useful responses: pointing out that velocity absorbers in corners do not work, you need pressure absorbers.
Click to expand...
This is not strictly true; it depends on the thickness. The better products are 10-20" deep so they do provide absorption in the room. I have measurements showing midbass absorption with corner traps.
 
Justdafactsmaam said:
Yes. It will be one or the other. Probably not the answer you want.

It’s too complicated to predict. Unfortunately trial and error is the final arbiter.
Click to expand...

If "trial and error" is the answer I do not want, then I definitely do not want that answer! But if you are saying that a wall bass trap vs. a corner bass trap is too complicated to predict, I can deal with that. For me (and I suspect many people), room intrusiveness and effectiveness are the main consideration. I want the minimum impact into living space and aesthetics but with maximum acoustic impact. This is why I have left off any bass room treatment and only relied on DSP, but DSP can only get you so far.

What do you think the inputs that would be required to predict whether a wall trap is more effective than a corner bass trap, assuming both are pressure absorbers?

Justdafactsmaam said:
What I can say with confidence is don’t skimp on the quality of the trap based on the idea that positioning will give you better results. Size is only part of the formula for pressure traps.

Get traps that target the trouble frequencies, offer the best objective absorption and experiment with placement until you get the best results
Click to expand...

What I have been thinking of for some time is to DIY my own bass traps, either a membrane absorber or a Helmholtz resonator. It would need to be tuneable. I am leaning towards a Helmholtz because it is easier to construct and easier to make it tuneable. All I need to do is to construct a box and place 5-10 BBQ air vents like this (if a bigger hole is required, I can simply remove some air vents). But I am not sure whether it a Helmholtz resonator would be more compact than a panel absorber, or whether corner placement would make it more effective.

Chromatischism said:
This is not strictly true; it depends on the thickness. The better products are 10-20" deep so they do provide absorption in the room. I have measurements showing midbass absorption with corner traps.
Click to expand...

Velocity absorbers depend on thickness and the air gap from the wall, it needs to be 1/4 wavelength of the lowest frequency desired to be effective, and it rapidly loses efficiency under that. At least, that is my understanding.
 
Keith_W said:
If "trial and error" is the answer I do not want, then I definitely do not want that answer!
Click to expand...
I get it. It’s a sucky answer. I don’t like it either. But as simple as the math is when it comes to waves in a three dimensional space (I joke, not simple) mathematical modeling generally assumes smooth simple boundaries and infinite rigidity. Real world spaces are ridiculously complicated and really screw you on predicting room behavior.
Keith_W said:
But if you are saying that a wall bass trap vs. a corner bass trap is too complicated to predict, I can deal with that.
Click to expand...

Just to be clear, I’m talking about positioning any pressure bass trap. Not about different trap designs.

Keith_W said:
For me (and I suspect many people), room intrusiveness and effectiveness are the main consideration. I want the minimum impact into living space and aesthetics but with maximum acoustic impact. This is why I have left off any bass room treatment and only relied on DSP, but DSP can only get you so far.
Click to expand...

I totally get that. IMO effective bass trapping is pretty much the domain of dedicated listening rooms

Keith_W said:
What do you think the inputs that would be required to predict whether a wall trap is more effective than a corner bass trap, assuming both are pressure absorbers?
Click to expand...

I think this is a case where the general rule of thumb will be your best predictor. Corners are your best bet.

Keith_W said:
What I have been thinking of for some time is to DIY my own bass traps, either a membrane absorber or a Helmholtz resonator. It would need to be tuneable. I am leaning towards a Helmholtz because it is easier to construct and easier to make it tuneable. All I need to do is to construct a box and place 5-10 BBQ air vents like this (if a bigger hole is required, I can simply remove some air vents). But I am not sure whether it a Helmholtz resonator would be more compact than a panel absorber, or whether corner placement would make it more effective.
Click to expand...
Anyone who has the time, tools and skills should DIY! I’d avoid the Helmholtz. By everything I have read and heard they are so specific that they miss the mark more often than not.

Keith_W said:
Velocity absorbers depend on thickness and the air gap from the wall, it needs to be 1/4 wavelength of the lowest frequency desired to be effective, and it rapidly loses efficiency under that. At least, that is my understanding.
Click to expand...
The rules of thumbs are good but not entirely on the money with velocity absorption. One thing to remember is velocity absorption absorbs all kinetic energy but never completely. None of it is all or nothing. Wavelength matters. But it’s all in degrees.
 
Keith_W said:
However, what has not yet been discussed is whether a panel trap works better on the wall or in the corner. Is there a comparison between the effectiveness of the two, in terms of attenuation and size?
Click to expand...
This video by John Brandt and Richard Lenz of Real Acoustix explains problems and findings of testing diaphragmatic absorbers with the ASTM C423 standards and effects of positioning:
Some more info bits in this post by R. Lenz: https://realacoustix.com/news/news-full-article/understanding-diaphragmatic-bass-trap-testing

Justdafactsmaam said:
I’d avoid the Helmholtz. By everything I have read and heard they are so specific that they miss the mark more often than not.
Click to expand...
I had 4 commercial helmholtz resonators to try in my room before buying, they kind of worked but very unpredictably. Didn't buy them.
 
Building and tuning a Helmholtz resonator is cheap, easy and was very effective in my use case (strong 45Hz room mode). You can get a similar result with a good room EQ like Dirac Live from the amplitude perspective. But often also very long reverberation is an issue which can be handled better by a Helmholtz resonator. https://homeaudio.jimdofree.com/ describes how I build and tuned it and the initial result. In https://homeaudio.jimdofree.com/dirac-live/ I added Dirac Live and compared the results.
 
What about the case of having something the size of a 2' by 4' GIK Monster bass trap "straddling" a corner? Is the argument here only about the placement of something like a velocity-absorbing soffit or triangular trap right into a corner dominated by pressure? Is "straddling" a thick velocity-absorbing panel across a corner with sufficient air gap still useful, or is this thread debunking that common recommendation?
 
Years ago I built big tube traps, 24" diameter, 7' tall, put them in the corners and they made a big difference, both measured and audible.
Is the gist of this discussion that they could make even more difference if I moved them out of the corners into the middle of the walls?
 
I sell TubeTraps, and we recommend putting them in the corners. They are fibrous but they need to be in high pressure zones because they have a volume inside, and when the pressure rises or falls outside the trap, the air tries to move in and out of the trap's center void, forcing motion through the fiber. We took a bunch of these up to NWAA labs to be tested in the corners of their big reveb chamber. Ron Sauro generously offered to do an extra test with them distributed around the room in other locations to see if they work as well. He thought they might, and was curious to find out. They didn't.
 
MRC01 said:
Years ago I built big tube traps, 24" diameter, 7' tall, put them in the corners and they made a big difference, both measured and audible.
Is the gist of this discussion that they could make even more difference if I moved them out of the corners into the middle of the walls?
Click to expand...
I believe that differs from my question in that tube traps are pressure-absorbers, whereby this thread seems to have established that corners are points of maximum pressure and are best treated with said pressure-absorbers such as tube traps.
 
Mr. Haelscheir said:
What about the case of having something the size of a 2' by 4' GIK Monster bass trap "straddling" a corner? Is the argument here only about the placement of something like a velocity-absorbing soffit or triangular trap right into a corner dominated by pressure? Is "straddling" a thick velocity-absorbing panel across a corner with sufficient air gap still useful, or is this thread debunking that common recommendation?
Click to expand...
It’s useful. Just not very useful. Ironically just like my answer.
 
Justdafactsmaam said:
I thought they were velocity absorbers
Click to expand...
Yes, TubeTraps are velocity absorbers. And, the work in high pressure zones because they force velocity to happen when they are exposed to rapid pressure changes. The whole concept of separating trap designs this way is not particularly useful. Almost all traps are designed to work in pressure zones. A velocity zone trap could be made, but I don't think that many of them are out there, especially for bass use.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
  • Locked
Please don't buy acoustic panels from GIK Acoustics, they are rubbish!
2 3 4
Replies
79
Views
9K
Jimbob54
Jimbob54
S
Acoustic Treatment Help!
2
Replies
25
Views
3K
Tom C
Tom C
B
Home office pre-vs-post acoustic treatment measurements
Replies
9
Views
2K
ozzy9832001
O
M
Room Treatment Advice
Replies
3
Views
700
Mattjkilo
M
T
Maximizing family listening enjoyment!? What techniques/equipment have you used?
Replies
10
Views
741
GXAlan
G
Back
Top Bottom