Samsung. Well that is a good fit as their reliability is crap too. Shame as Revel is still a decent brand. Cute little amp, but seems a very small cabinet to have any luck in cooling or even a big enough power supply. Form factor designed by marketing, not engineering.
How much heat an old AB puts out depends on the class A region. It may be pretty large. It could also be that it seems hot as the heat sinks are no where near large enough. My 60W MOSFET amp has bigger heat sinks than some of these newer 200W amps. I ran a couple Watts class A though. Heat sinks are expensive.
I was a fan of the RA 800 series when used on mid-fi speakers. Moved to Parasound 2200's when I upgraded to better speakers. Then to my own MOSFET. I too heard the Rotel class D, along with the Peachtree, so have stayed away from them. But I have been told to listen to the Lyngdorf and March as they will change my mind. So said a salesman ( his lips were moving, so maybe a lie) even the NAD C268 is worth a listen. Execution is probably more important than the technology. I have heard class A amps that stink, AB that were wonderful. Of course, I have heard wonderful class A and horrific AB. Class D may be just like transistors were when new, much to learn on implementation. Go back to the Carver "magnetic field" amplifier. I think pretty much a class D concept and not what I called HI-FI. More WAYBACK machine, I would take a good Luxman or even Dynaco tube amp over the 1960 transistor amps, but now, I would take a class D over even a Cary.
One issue with class D is that below the rated output, they are very clean. Most of us would pick in a blind A/B test, an amp with a bit more even low order distortion over one with much less, but higher order and odd. All things equal, which they are not as other factors involving gain and feedback come to play. Simple vs well done CCS on the LTP and VAS, local vs global feedback and dominant pole filter vs. Miller compensation, so what caused the preference may not be as clear as simple non-linear distortion. It is complicated.