markk02474
Member
Wow, global negative feedback, just like my 28 year old, 760 wpc (@8Ohms), 120db S/N, Crown Macro Reference. Global NFB on my amp gives it high damping factor even at high frequencies.
Last edited:
Global feedback on a class AB amplifier is easy and almost as old as amplifiers.Wow, global negative feedback, just like my 28 year old, 760 wpc, 120db S/N, Crown Macro Reference. Global NFB on my amp gives it high damping factor even at high frequencies.
Global NFB is in DACs now. I forget where I saw it though. I think there is already local NFB inside some DAC chips.Global feedback on a class AB amplifier is easy and almost as old as amplifiers.
On a class D amplifier it's much more tricky in the analog domain, but still not new.
The novelty here is to execute the global feedback in the digital domain.
That is called delta-sigma, not new eitherGlobal NFB is in DACs now. I forget where I saw it though. I think there is already local NFB inside some DAC chips.
Global feedback is new, however.That is called delta-sigma, not new either
The citation amp is available directly on HK website (at least in France)
I put it in the basket, but can't decide if I finish the order or not ^^
Just made an account to share my experience and give you some feedback about this amp.
In the web page, we can find;
“The result is a Class A audio performance at Class D efficiency, size and cost,” summarizes Langezaal.
Does this mean that the "performance" of this new Class-D amp wound be similar or identical to that of a Class-A Hi-Fi amp, and not exceeding the Class-A?
Furthermore, does he believe Class-A is better than usual Class-AB in "pefrormance"? I feel he would think so...
Even though I fully agree with "Calss d keeps improving", apart from "efficiency, size and cost", but in terms of "performance", Hi-Fi Class-A amps would be still a high above "target" for new Calss D amps; his summary gave such impression for me.
You seem to be very class conscious. Transparent is transparent, and that is all that one needs to be aware of, however it is delivered..
So -- in the context of this forum -- how can this be? Has Sonos engineered frequency contouring into the front end of this amplifier to add "brightness" (MR or treble boost?) and/or "always on" loudness? I know nothing about this component, so I am genuinely curious.after some times with the Sonos amp i can understand comments saying it is bright. This amp is very lean and lack some bass when listen at low level. I guess this could explain why loudness is on by default.
Without knowing the guts of the amplifier, I would bet on an old style class D with out of control loop output filter, having a tendency to boost or attenuate the highs pending the speaker. Nothing engineered on purpose.So -- in the context of this forum -- how can this be? Has Sonos engineered frequency contouring into the front end of this amplifier to add "brightness" (MR or treble boost?) and/or "always on" loudness? I know nothing about this component, so I am genuinely curious.
This question is meant generically; not directed at the poster per se.
So -- in the context of this forum -- how can this be? Has Sonos engineered frequency contouring into the front end of this amplifier to add "brightness" (MR or treble boost?) and/or "always on" loudness? I know nothing about this component, so I am genuinely curious.
This question is meant generically; not directed at the poster per se.
The Sonos guts is Qualcomm DDFA. These kinds of amps do have deviation from flat at the high end, a shown in Amir's measurement of the Sonos Amp and also Stereophile measurements of NAD DDFA amps. However, someone posted measurements of Sonos vs another amp that show they overlay exactly, so at least with the right speakers there is no brightness problem.Without knowing the guts of the amplifier, I would bet on an old style class D with out of control loop output filter, having a tendency to boost or attenuate the highs pending the speaker. Nothing engineered on purpose.