I can see what you mean there, and why the look of a real book would be strange and have some demerit points relative to what you’ve gotten used to.
For me, images on digital screens, have a sort of unsubstantial ephemeral quality.
It’s a sort of (but not exactly) the medium is the message thing for me. Digital images come to me in a medium that I associate with quick gratification, where the amount of information and pictures seems unlimited, and in which I bounce around, taking in titbits of images and information in a sort of restless fashion. And I find it just influences my experience of whatever is presented to me on that platform - on computer screens of one sort of another.
That even happens with images I really love. My friend is a painter, incredibly talented at capturing the nuances of delicate light. I can view his paintings on his website on my computer screen (which is a nice large 5K computer screen), but it’s nothing like being in the gallery and observing the paintings in person. I’m much more absorbed and take more time drinking in the nuances in that condition than I am when it’s just another one of countless possible images on my computer screen.
Likewise, I have a large book of drawings and sketches by the film animator Ray Harryhausen. I can see some of those images online, But it’s just not the same as the tangibility of holding a reproduction of the art in my hands, and being able to examine it.
A lot of this, of course, comes down to one’s relationship to digital life and screens. Some people, certainly more young people, seem pretty comfortable with staring at the screens much of the time. Where are some of us find it salubrious to take breaks from screens and interact with the tangible world.
Too each his/her own of course.