I've always found it interesting. I just didn't understand you were asking about that specifically. That's why I asked for clarification.
Your challenge "Where did I claim whatever was interesting?" looked like a deflection when I read it. I wasn't assuming unreasonably, you were interested in your own argument, as it turns out. But that's not important to get stuck arguing about.
Initial misundestandings aside, the substance of my reply was that your argument that "it's $9800 overpriced" is calculated on personal value judgement (obviously). We can say I value the industrial design etc of the device more than you do, so my calculus is different. Personally I don't think different industrial design is fungible (others might). If we have sufficient disposable income, then a preference for particular design etc equates to acceptable (or preferable) value. In this case we can also enjoy a design preference without any audible disadvantage (not always the case with limited production audio gear).