(1) JBL 306P MK II Review (Studio Monitor) | Audio Science Review (ASR) ForumI’m an amateur enthusiast, not an expert. I’m really happy with my JBL 306P’s for classical music. I have them on my desktop with a PC and Sabaj D5 (ASR special). I found the best sound quality with the input selector set at +4dBu. I set the output volume at 5, because sitting so close, I just don’t need more, and it helps reduce this hiss.
I expect that with local taxes and import duties, a convenient rule of thumb is to go JBL if in USA, and Genelec or Neumann if in Europe, Yamaha in Asia. I don’t know what’s best for Canada, Mexico, Central or South America, or the rest of the world. Some places are probably relatively expensive no matter what you do, but the more local the company is, the less it should cost to get the product to you.
If I were you, I'd try to stretch my budget "a bit" for the Kali IN-5.Thank you guys. I live in Germany, should have specified that I mean 500€. I suppose I could find used gear on Ebay Kleinanzeigen or normal Ebay.
I may have something for you:Thank you guys. I live in Germany, should have specified that I mean 500€. I suppose I could find used gear on Ebay Kleinanzeigen or normal Ebay.
Hello everyone. Complete amateur when it comes to audio equipment here.
Trained musician, just looking for accurate and honest pair of studio monitors for classical music critical listening.
If you think I could get a pair of great passive speakers for that price, I am open to suggestions.
The models I read about:
Focal Alpha 65
Presonus Eris 7 xt and 8 xt
Mackie MR624 and MR824
Adam Audio T5V and T7V
Tannoy Gold 7 and 8
Thank you in advance! Looking forward to your suggestions.
Volume and bass.Guys, I have to say that I am really happy that I became a part of this community.
Thank you for all your suggestions.
I have to aks, are there advantages in buying 8 inch woofer over smaller ones?
So Mackie MR824, ADAM T7V and Kali LP 8 are on my list.
A nearly fifty year old design, and the only speaker to displace Quad ESLs from our system.
Not my advert, but I'm totally biased, and still in love with a £20 pair of these I found in a secondhand shop many moons ago; (& yes, having dealer connections allowed me to hear plenty of speakers up until circa 2010. Maybe there was a great leap forward starting 2011? In which case please ignore my nonsense )
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/333925009422?_trksid=p2380057.m570.l5999&_trkparms=gh1g=I333925009422.N36.S2.typeWATCH_ITEM_ENDING_SOON.R2.TR2
Odd isn't? It's the DM2's bass qualities that I like so much. Fast, deep and effortless, as a good TL should be.Oh Gawd, on anything percussive or plucked in the bass, DM2/2A had an indistinct bass but the mids and highs were always good as per the HF1300/Coles pairing over various models. For me, the KEF 104ab was the one back then, although I originally went with Spendor Bc1's, accepting the low bass 'honk' they exhibit. BC1's are a collectors item and a minefield, but better than Quad 57's overall (oh yess indeedy 0 done the comparison many times).
Surely today, a smaller active set can be set up and balanced to sound real on voice and string tone?
Surely today, a smaller active set can be set up and balanced to sound real on voice and string tone?
Volume and bass, yes, but generally worse directivity matching at the crossover to the tweeter.Thank you Robin. 8 inch it is!