beagleman
Major Contributor
Nor does it hurt.Determining audibility thresholds is important, no argument there. But the subjective impressions of one reviewer in an uncontrolled listening situation doesn’t provide any useful data to help reach that goal.
Reading just random measurements tells me some thingsFOR SURE, but not if they are audible............So where does that leave us??
And yes it does help to some readers, such as myself. It is not definitive for sure, and nothing in life truly is. But it beats bashing something as sounding "Horrible" based on just READING measurements, at least in my mind.
I mean some of you guys are looking at ANY subjective impressions as a total negative, not sure it has to be.
Amir regularly mentions mediocre measurements, and will often add, "But did not notice it during listening as being an issue".
Last edited: